Unveiling Housing Trends: The New, New Market—Understanding San Mateo County and Belmont Markets – and a 2023 Wrap Up…

Get ready to be captivated by the unveiling of the New, New housing market – a realm that has never been encountered.

Whether you’re already a homeowner or dreaming of becoming one, this end-of-year recap is your golden ticket to exploring the mesmerizing future of Peninsula Real Estate.

Brace yourself for a paradigm shift that might just redefine the real estate game for years to come.

In order to put our New, New market into perspective, a little retrospection is in order. We’re about to unravel the mystery into the feverish ride of the government’s bond-buying bonanza that kicked off in 2008, akin to a superhero swooping in to rescue the struggling housing market and economy from their doldrums but with consequences more obscured by time…

Imagine people in 2013 dancing a jig as they refinance their homes at historically low mortgage rates, hitting new lows every year. Homeowners, practically giddy, were high-fiving each other at snagging a sub 3% rate, watching their mortgage payments take a nosedive, and then going on a shopping spree for new toys like they just won the lottery. 

Ah, the ironic nostalgia hits like a blast from the 1998 dot-com past. It’s like reminiscing about the Internet boom and bust, where Silicon Valley was popping champagne bottles, celebrating a new millionaire being minted every day. It was all glitz and glamour until someone finally shouted, “Hold up, is there even a ‘there’ there?

Now, we’re not claiming to be fortune-tellers, but more than a decade ago, we threw out a warning in this article. We were like, “Hey, if these rates stay low forever, everyone and their grandma will refinance or buy a home at these crazy low rates, and they might never want to move again!” It turns out we might have been onto something.

We did a fast rewind of how our housing market got here in this post back in August of 2023. Fast forward to where we are today…

The 2023 housing market results are now clear. Let’s compare the years and quarters to understand what happened:

San Mateo County (SMC) Overview:

Comparing 2019 to 2023:

  • Home sales went down by 17%.
  • New listing inventory decreased by 16%.
  • Days on the Market decreased by 11% to 25 days.
  • The Median home price went up by 16%.
  • Sellers received slightly less of the asking price, down 1% to 103% of asking.

Comparing 2022 to 2023:1

  • Home sales decreased by 17%.
  • New listing inventory dropped by 20%.
  • Days on the Market increased by 25% to 25 days.
  • The Median home price went down by 5.5%.
  • Sellers received less of the asking price, down 3.7% to 103% of asking.

1The decline in 2023 is emphasized by the unusual increase in home activity during the first quarter of 2022. The market in San Mateo County remained rather flat from Q4 2022 to Q4 2023.

Comparing Q4 2022 to Q4 2023:

  • Home sales were down by 6%.
  • New listing inventory increased by 9%.
  • Days on the Market increased by 15% to 30 days.
  • Median home prices remained unchanged year over year.
  • Sellers received less of the asking price, down 3.9% to 99% of asking.

For Belmont:

Comparing 2019 to 2023:

  • Home sales went down by 23%.
  • New listing inventory decreased by 24%.
  • Days on the Market decreased by 9% to 20 days.
  • The Median home price went up by 25%.
  • Sellers received the same percentage of the asking price.

Comparing 2022 to 2023:

  • Home sales decreased by 13%.
  • New listing inventory dropped by 22%.
  • Days on the Market increased by 33% to 20 days.
  • The Median home price went down by 10%.
  • Sellers received less of the asking price, down 7% to 104% of asking.

Comparing Q4 2022 to Q4 2023:

  • Home sales went up by 9%.
  • New listing inventory decreased by 4%.2
  • Days on the Market decreased by 24% to 22 days.
  • Median home price increased by 2%.2
  • Sellers received more of the asking price, up 5% to 105% of asking.

2What is helping to keep home values steady is the short supply of homes for sale, maintaining the months of housing inventory to approximately a one-month supply.

As We See It

When the government bought bonds to drive down interest rates in 2008, it was a welcome jolt to jump-start a beleaguered housing market and economy.

People could refinance to historically low mortgage rates, which seemed to reach a new low each year. Homeowners were giddy at landing a sub 3% rate, watching their mortgage payments fall by half, and snapping up new toys with their excess pocket money like drunken sailors.

Not that we’re not claiming to be prophets. Still, we were first concerned about this more than ten years ago, correctly calculating that if these low rates remained low long enough, nearly everyone would have refinanced or purchased a home with a historically low rate, which, in all likelihood, would not be seen again in our lifetime.

It didn’t take much prognosticating in our 2013 article to realize that sellers would be reticent to kiss goodbye at their sub 3% rate to get another bedroom when rates returned to historical norms.

The New, New Market

Enter the Pillars of Movement – the mystical forces that shape the real estate universe. In our 2013 article, we saw it coming: When interest rates decide to do a head-snapping reversion to historical norms, sellers won’t be willing to bid adieu to their sub 3% rate just for an extra bedroom. And guess what’s next – the pool of potential inventory shrinks, thanks to one pillar of the housing inventory.

Pillars of Movement

Yet another pillar emerges – one insulated from rate ramifications—the sellers cashing out and saying so long to the Bay Area with pockets full of cash, ready to conquer the world and buy their forever home mortgage-free.

And sure, there’s always the ebb and flow of people coming and going due to job transfers, but only some people leaving want to throw in the housing towel. Because let’s face it, once you’ve left the Bay Area, rejoining the housing game is like trying to win the lottery twice – expensive and seemingly impossible.

Now, behold the last pillar – the legacy homes. Those sacred abodes where families were raised, but now, faced with the ultimate decision for sustainability or the inevitable march of time, these homes hit the market.

As we peer into the future of 2024, a foreseen vision emerges:

  • Anticipate the descent of mortgage interest rates in Q2, beckoning buyers back into the market.
  • This shift is poised to elevate home values, with a forecast of modest increases in housing prices.
  • In this unfolding scenario, both buyers and sellers are likely to acclimate to market interest rates, proceeding with life’s plans.
  • While inventory is projected to see a slight uptick, it is not expected to significantly diminish home values or disrupt the delicate interplay of low supply and high demand.

Drew and Christine Morgan are experienced REALTORS and NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. They have assisted buyers and sellers in their community for over 30 years. Drew and Christine have received the coveted Diamond award and ranked among the top 50 agents nationwide and top 3 in Northern California by RE/MAX. To contact them, please call (650) 508.1441 or email info@morganhomes.com.

For all you need to know about Belmont, subscribe to this blog right here. You can also follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

This article provides educational information and is intended for informational purposes only. It should not be considered as real estate, tax, insurance, or legal advice, and it cannot replace advice tailored to your specific situation. It’s always best to seek guidance from a professional who is familiar with your scenario.

BROKER | MANAGER | NOTARY

San Mateo County Rising Home Prices, Plummeting Transactions, and the Impact on Belmont

Despite homes being above water and values steadily increasing on the Peninsula, the overall market is not in top shape, as the number of transactions is at an all-time low.

                          Overview:

  • Home values are consistently rising on the Peninsula.
    • However, the number of home transactions is currently at an all-time low.

Recent Data (Q3 2023):

  • In San Mateo County, new listings are down 6.7% compared to a year ago.
    • Compared to a more typical year, 2018, new listings are down significantly by 18.3%.
    • When compared to the Great Recession in 2008, new listings have plummeted by almost 60%.

Sales Trends:

  • Sales have decreased by 15% from last year, 20% from 2018, and 26% from 2008.

Home Prices:

  • Despite (or because of) the decrease in available homes, home prices are rising.
    • Following the basic economic principle of supply and demand, the limited supply is driving up prices.
    • In San Mateo County, home values have increased by 1% since last year, 13% since 2018, and an impressive 46% since 2008.

Local Impact in Belmont:

  • In Belmont, the impact of higher interest rates is more pronounced.
    • New listings are down by 4.5% from last year’s Q3, but significantly lower by 70% since 2018 and 80% since 2008.

In essence, while home prices are rising due to limited supply, the number of available homes for sale and overall transactions has significantly declined, especially when compared to previous years.

Drew and Christine Morgan are experienced REALTORS and NOTARY PUBLIC located in Belmont, CA. They have been assisting buyers and sellers in their community for over 30 years. Drew and Christine have received the coveted Diamond award and ranked among the top 50 agents nationwide and top 3 in Northern California by RE/MAX. To contact them, please call (650) 508.1441 or email info@morganhomes.com.

or all you need to know about Belmont, subscribe to this blog right here. You can also follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

This article provides educational information and is intended for informational purposes only. It should not be considered as real estate, tax, insurance, or legal advice, and it cannot replace advice tailored to your specific situation. It’s always best to seek guidance from a professional who is familiar with your scenario.

BROKER | MANAGER | NOTARY

Unlocking Real Estate Mysteries: A Tale of Reconveyance and the Costly Lien Surprise

A reconveyance deed is like the hero that conveys the title back to the trustor-borrower when the borrowed money is fully repaid. Picture it as the grand finale in the mortgage repayment saga.

Continue reading

From Snail’s Pace to Silver Linings: Unwrapping the Real Estate Tale of 2023

It’s almost unbelievable to think of any sector in the Bay Area facing an 18% income drop, but when you couple that with a 25% decline in available homes to sell, it paints a picture that’s not just about numbers—it’s a story.

Continue reading

Maximizing Your Real Estate Investment: Unlocking $1.5 Million in Untaxed Gain

If you’ve been residing in your Bay Area home for over five years, chances are you’ve already surpassed the $500,000 capital gains abatement threshold.

Continue reading

Unveiling the Thrilling Odyssey of Bay Area Housing Values: A Tale of Peaks, Plummets, and Uncertain Horizons

Our market peaked in May of 2022, began a slow slide until it hit bottom of that year in November, before regaining its traction and the slow pace of recovery.

Continue reading

“Unveiling Housing Trends: Navigating New Listings Decline and Market Fluctuations”

We recently published an article titled “Navigating Bay Area Real Estate: Balancing Wealth Optimization and Limited Data Amidst Shifting Market Dynamics” that sparked significant reader inquiries seeking clarity. Within this piece, we delved into the year-over-year assessment of home values for June, a customary method to analyze housing trends.

However, exploring micro trends can prove beneficial during market volatility. This involves observing month-to-month changes. The challenge in doing so is the presence of seasonal fluctuations in the real estate market. The trends we compiled for San Mateo County and our residing city, Belmont, illustrate a gradual price recovery compared to the preceding article, where annual values had receded in quarters Q2-Q4 of 2022.

San Mateo County 2023

Though yet to reach the peak levels of 2022, at least for now, home values appear to have stabilized and are maintaining, if not gently appreciating.

Belmont 2023

We exemplify this by presenting an illustrative graph generated by Fred®, utilizing the Case-Shiller® data methodology linked here. While this data trails the market by three months, it remains valuable for investors analyzing value patterns. The most recent trend depicted suggests we may have surpassed the market trough and are trending upwards.

Opting for gradual growth is preferable due to its sustainability. The graph we provided indicates growth is so gradual that any economic shift could easily reverse the trajectory.

The market correction following the hyper-growth observed in Q1 of 2002—driven by imminent interest rate hikes—seems to have subsided. The question now is the duration it will take for buyers and sellers to adjust and realize that the era of sub-3% loans is unlikely to return, prompting them to proceed with their life plans.

Sales in the Bay Area have declined by 30%, a result of a similar 30% drop in available new listings.

Presently, prevailing market dynamics impact our housing sector, with both sellers and buyers hesitating due to current interest rates, despite their historical below-average nature.

A further incongruous position we have today is the dichotomy between sellers awaiting price rebounds and buyers finding that prices are already too steep.

According to a recent survey by Fannie Mae, the nation’s primary purchaser of secondary market loans, 82% of buyers believe it’s an inopportune time to purchase a home.

The query remains: When will one of these groups move into action?

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 30 years of experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. As Diamond recipients, Drew and Christine ranked in the top 50 RE/MAX agents nationwide and the top 3 in Northern California.  They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or emailed at info@morganhomes.com.

For all you need to know about Belmont, subscribe to this blog right here. You can also follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax, insurance or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew Morgan—Broker Associate 01124318 | Christine Morgan—Salesperson 01174047

Co-Owners of Morganhomes, Inc. Licensed under RE/MAX Star Properties 01811140

Save the Daylight- When Did Daylight Saving Time Start

How and When Did Daylight Saving Time Start?

It’s that time of the year to turn the clocks back to end Daylight Saving Time.

Of course you’ll remember to turn your clocks back when you go to bed Saturday night, but do you know why–beside for the obvious reasons that you want to be in sync with the rest of the country?

My brother sent me a great book a few years ago titled “Seieze The Daylight” by David Prerau that explained the whole reason we have a Daylight Saving period and how it originated. Below, you’ll find a brief synopsis of his book.

For example, did you know that one of the more staunch advocates for when to end Daylight Saving Time is the candy industry? They rely heavily on the sale of candy near Halloween. Over the years they have lobbied heavily to end Daylight Saving Time after Halloween so that their customers would enjoy an additional hour of trick-or-treating. Looks like they finally won.

Ben Franklin-of “early to bed and early to rise” fame-was apparently the first person to suggest the concept of daylight savings, according to computer scientist David Prerau, author of the book Seize the Daylight: The Curious and Contentious Story of Daylight Saving Time. Benjamin Franklin

While serving as U.S. ambassador to France in Paris, Franklin wrote of being awakened at 6 a.m. and realizing, to his surprise, that the sun would rise far earlier than he usually did. Imagine the resources that might be saved if he and others rose before noon and burned less midnight oil, Franklin, tongue half in cheek, wrote to a newspaper.

“Franklin seriously realized it would be beneficial to make better use of daylight but he didn’t really know how to implement it,” Prerau said.

It wasn’t until World War I that daylight savings were realized on a grand scale. Germany was the first state to adopt the time changes, to reduce artificial lighting and thereby save coal for the war effort. Friends and foes soon followed suit.

In the U.S. a federal law standardized the yearly start and end of daylight saving time in 1918-for the states that chose to observe it.

But there was also a real need for standardized time too. Prior to public train transportation, people traveled very slowly from point to point. Once they arrived in a town they would reset their watch to whatever time the local town square clock tower read. Once transportation by train became prevalent, people would find themselves in perhaps more than one time zone in a day and people waiting for a train needed to know that everyone was on the same relative time.

During World War II the U.S. made daylight saving time mandatory for the whole country, as a way to save wartime resources. Between February 9, 1942, and September 30, 1945, the government took it a step further. During this period daylight saving time was observed year-round, essentially making it the new standard time, if only for a few years.

Since the end of World War II, though, daylight saving time has always been optional for U.S. states. But its beginning and end have shifted-and occasionally disappeared.

During the 1973-74 Arab oil embargo, the U.S. once again extended daylight saving time through the winter, resulting in a one percent decrease in the country’s electrical load, according to federal studies cited by Prerau.

Thirty years later the Energy Policy Act of 2005 was enacted, mandating a controversial month long extension of daylight saving time, starting in 2007.

But does daylight saving time really save any energy?

Want more? Click here…

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or emailed at info@morganhomes.com.

You can find them on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/Morganhomes and also find them on Twitter @ https://twitter.com/morganhomes

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Which City Is More Affordable–Belmont or San Carlos

Belmont vs San Carlos Home Values

NOTE: This post is in response you a question posed on the Belmont Patch:

Q.    How does Belmont’s property prices rise compare with nearby San Carlos’ which has the Laurel Street downtown and the industrial area?

A.  To answer this question as posted on the Patch by Gladwyn d’Souza, we had to do compare home sales and price points in Belmont to San Carlos over a period of time to see if any trend appeared.

We chose 2006-2013, which effectively covers the period right before and through our local housing recession and into the recovery.

We’ve spent a week looking at the numbers and trying as best we could to put them into a comprehensive perspective without analysis paralysis setting in.

The short answer is Belmont is lagging the home price appreciation of San Carlos. But there’s a lot more to it than that. If I’m reading into the question correctly, (since we received more than one request for this analysis) essentially people want to find out if having an industrial and downtown area creates more value in the local housing market and if that influences the rate at which homes appreciate—which is a slightly different question than just trying to answer if homes near a downtown cost more—this question includes do homes go up in value at a faster rate than surrounding areas. If I am paraphrasing that incorrectly, I apologize.

Unfortunately, the Patch limits how long we our response to a post can be so we are including this link to our own blog page where we can give the answer justice as well as add the appropriate graphs and documentation. We invite you to join us here for our in-depth answer.

Let’s begin by answering the question do the homes values go up at a faster rate…

We need not involve Belmont for this part of the analysis—not yet. That actually serves to complicate the answer because first we need to know if the homes near downtown San Carlos are indeed going up at a faster rate than homes which are not near downtown. This methodology eliminates  unnecessary variables created by comparing two cities which could unjustly influence the results—issue such as weather, governance, schools, transportation, shopping, etcetera—to name a few.

Our Multiple Listing Service allows us to break down sales by rather arbitrary but effective boundaries. For example we can look at the White Oaks area in San Carlos and compare it to the homes just north of Holly on the Belmont border, or homes which are more sequestered in the San Carlos hills on Crestview.

White Oaks SQFT LOT $/SQFT Median Price Rate of App Size Diff Adjusted Rate $/SQFT

2011

1600

6000

$538

$932,000

2012

1501

6300

$629

$950,000

1.9%

-6.6%

8.5%

16.9%

2013

1775

5760

$759

$1,352,000

42.3%

15.4%

26.9%

20.6%
SCL Hills Rate Size

2011

2175

8058

$498

$998,000

2012

2090

8400

$546

$1,105,000

10.7%

-3.9%

14.6%

9.7%

2013

2170

8300

$629

$1,380,000

24.9%

3.8%

28.7%

15.2%

 

As one can see the raw rate of median home price appreciation is considerably higher in the White Oaks than in the San Carlos Hills. And when we compare the price per square foot we arrive at the same conclusion—that homes near downtown in San Carlos coast more per square foot and are going up at a faster rate. However, the adjusted rate takes into consideration the variation in the size of homes selling in these two areas. We factored that in as best we could—admittedly it’s not a perfect system but, for example, in the White Oaks on 2013 we surmised that if the raw rate of appreciation was 42.3% over the prior year, but the homes were 15.4% larger, then we are not comparing apples to apples. So to be consistent we subtracted this variance from the rate of appreciation for an “adjusted rate”. Normalizing these two variables offers up a much more stable rate of appreciation and probably closer to the actual difference in these two areas—which isn’t much.

Clearly it appears that people are willing to pay more to be closer to a downtown as is evidenced in the Bel-Carlos map below illustrating the price per square foot people are willing to pay. Does that fully answer the question of are homes near downtown selling for more—or appreciating at a higher rate? Certainly not. The reason is complex and two-fold. First, homes in areas which were harder hit by the housing market collapse are enjoying a higher rate of appreciation—counterintuitive perhaps to their respective locations—because they have a greater distance to rebound—in other words, the values dropped further and faster in these areas hence they are rebounding at an inverse rate.

Case in point, the Sterling Downs area of Belmont. Known for its superior microclimate weather, this area is home to many original floor plans  which consisted of a 1,010 Sqft three bedroom 1 bath home. At that size, the price point for these homes was less than surrounding larger Belmont homes and much more affordable to the first-time homebuyer—many of the very homeowners who found themselves in financial trouble when the housing market imploded. In Sterling downs in 2011 there were only 10 sales—two of which were distressed sales. Simply put—many could not afford to sell and take a loss in 2011. In 2012 the number of sales shot up to 19 but eight were distressed sales, while in 2013 a whopping 33 sales were logged and only 1 was a distress sale. It’s easy to see with values plummeting more in Sterling Downs than others areas of Belmont it’s no wonder they are bouncing back at a higher rate. And they just happen to be closer to downtown…

Sterling Downs SQFT Lot $/SQFT Median Price Rate App Size Adjusted $/SQFT Inc.

2011

1469

5387.5

$443

$667,000

2012

1190

5330

$539

$650,000

-2.5%

-23.4%

20.9%

21.6%

2013

1190

5000

$673

$825,000

26.9%

0.0%

26.9%

24.8%
Belmont Heights SQFT Lot $/SQFT Median Price Rate App Size Adjusted $/SQFT Inc.

2011

2500

9639

$515

$1,221,000

2012

2150

9600

$539

$1,121,050

-8.2%

-16.3%

8.1%

4.7%

2013

2480

8990

$613

$1,400,000

24.9%

13.3%

11.6%

13.7%

 

The second factor skewing the results is that homes which are smaller sell for less per square foot.

Is price per square foot the most accurate statistic for analysis to reflect the true picture of an areas worth? Not really, and here’s why. Larger homes sell for less per square foot because land, not factored into the calculation, accounts for more than 50% of a home’s worth. Therefore a relatively small 1,010 square foot home in Sterling downs will sell for more per square foot than one in Belmont Heights (Hallmark Area) which average 2,010 square feet in size, yet the median price is far less in Sterling Downs.

Empirically speaking, we know that people pay a lot of money for very small homes near downtown San Carlos—finding the data to clearly illustrate the phenomenon has proven more difficult.

Now for the bigger question of how does the rate of appreciation in San Carlos compare to that of Belmont’s?

Belmont vs San Carlos Median PriceTrendWhat the numbers illustrate is that San Carlos has a higher median home price than that of its neighbor to the north, Belmont, and as long as we’ve lived here (which is now going on over 21 years) it always has.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Carlos Increse over BelWe’ve noticed in both recent market corrections (1989 and 2007), that as the market cools, so does the discrepancy between the two city’s median home price. And when there’s a bull housing market, San Carlos begins to pull away at a higher rate of appreciation. Of course as in nature, a sort of market equilibrium begins to set in when values are too far apart to lessen the disparity in home prices—akin to water filling a void.

 

 

 

 

Here we see that not only do you pay more to live in San Carlos you also get a smaller home for the money. And since the lot sizes in the two areas are relatively similar, larger lot sizes in one area which could affect values can be ignored.

Median Price SQFT %Median∆ %SQFT∆ Adjusted ∆
Belmont 2013

$1,088,000

1840
San Carlos 2013

$1,210,000

1765

10.1%

-4.2%

14.3%

The raw data show that the median home price in San Carlos in 2013 was 10.1% higher than Belmont’s, but since one also gets a home 4.2% smaller we adjusted the true estimated median home price differential to be close to 14.3%. Calculating it another way, if we take the difference in the size of homes selling and multiply it by the price per square foot of San Carlos homes we get an additional $52,000 of appreciation bringing our median home price increase in San Carlos over Belmont closer to 16% for the year.

So it appears that the same home in San Carlos will cost you about 14-16% more–no matter where in San Carlos it is located.  The next question to attempt to answer is why?

Imagine if Belmont and San Carlos had no border? After all, the city borders exist on maps but in reality the imaginary borders are crossed frequently as Belmont and San Carlos residents have unfettered access to their neighboring cities amenities (except at the end of Hallmark Drive and Crestview).

What if we removed the artificial borders and created one large new town called Bel-Carlos, for our analysis. Now it’s just one big happy city with various neighborhoods-like it really is. Because last we checked San Carlos and Belmont offered reciprocity to their neighboring cities for access to shopping, restaurants and parks—you name it. Would a person really choose to live in San Carlos and pay more just to enjoy the distinction that their city had a downtown? After all, they could live a few blocks north and get to the same restaurants and stores?

We think that the proximity to the downtown is more attractive than the mere fact that one exists. To illustrate this we see that the values near downtown in San Carlos (price per square foot) are greater than neighborhoods further away—in San Carlos and Belmont.

Bel Carlos Map

In this map we combined San Carlos and Belmont to create a borderless “Bel-Carlos” and then we used data since 2007 in each area to examine the price per square foot which homes sold for.  In almost each case San Carlos homes cost per square foot exceeded that of Belmont’s in the neighborhoods we examined.

Now in our new city, Bel-Carlos we have the same distinction. Some neighborhoods in Bel-Carlos are more expensive (per square foot) than others. Offering walking distance to Bel-Carlos’ fine dining fetches a higher price per square foot than neighborhoods further away.

Overall, the home values in San Carlos are higher and go up at a faster rate than those of her neighboring city of Belmont. Is it that San Carlos has a larger downtown with many fine restaurants, the warmer weather, shopping opportunities, community involvement or the city governance? It’s most likely all of the above. That said, there are many who choose Belmont for the beauty of the hills, proximity to major commute arteries, and the cooler mountain air.

Whichever city you choose you call home, we’re here to help.

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or email at info@morganhomes.com.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

 

Why Waiting Out the Market May be a Fool’s Game

Should you buy a home now, or wait?

Let’s face it; nobody wants to purchase a home at the peak of the market. And most buyers would love to imagine they got a good deal. But with today’s local market conditions, that’s a tall order to fill.

The internet has changed the way buyers search for homes. Gone are the days of buyers waiting for their REALTOR to call each week with the latest new listings. Today, buyers have more-or-less unfettered access to the Multiple Listing Service where agents cooperate by sharing their inventory of homes for sale.

There is a small selection of “off-market” or “Pocket Listings” which we discussed in an earlier article. How do you find these? For that, you still need a REALTOR.

The larger question is should you purchase a home today, or wait for more inventory or prices to decline?

This graph for San Mateo County illustrates that as of June 2013 we are still not back to historic high home values—though in select neighborhoods on the Peninsula we just recently surpassed previous historic highs.

 

San Mateo Home Values

Today’s buyers are snapping up homes with a frenzied sense of urgency—and they’re paying top dollar to do so. Why?  Because interest rates are still very favorable and increase a buyer’s ability to pay over the seller’s asking price—but the trend is about to change and probably for good. We predict that in Q2 of 2014 mortgage interest rates will probably be a full point higher than they are today. And that’s not pure conjecture; the Federal Reserve has not only signaled they have overtly stated that when unemployment reaches  6.5% it will begin raising the federal funds rate—and they have already begun easing up on purchasing bonds to artificially keep rates low. In this article we discussed how much more one would pay interest over the life of a  home loan when rates return to normal levels–and the numbers are staggering.

If the entire country’s housing market was rebounding at the same rate of homes on the Peninsula, one can easily see that the Fed would have already reacted and raised rates.

Buyers are locking in lower than historical trend rates and in most cases paying well over what a seller is asking for a home because money is cheap.

Should I wait for More Favorable Conditions?

Have you been lulled into thinking these historic low rates will continue? Then take a moment to read this eye opening post we did back in March. Trying to save more money for a down payment at this point may be futile as home prices are escalating at a rate that the average buyer could never keep up with in monthly savings. Once interest rates begin to rise to normal historical levels, any perceived savings—even if the market cools off—will be quickly negated in interest higher payments.

We’ve been in business for over 20 years selling home on the Peninsula and we’ve experienced several recessions so the trends and cycles are obvious to us. Timing them is more difficult, but from everything we have seen, we believe it would be better in today’s environment to jump in and get a home today, rather than bet on more favorable conditions in the near future. If you are still sitting in the sidelines, you are betting against the odds—that unprecedented low interest rates will continue, and that home prices have already hit their peak and will soon decline. Barring any unforeseen catastrophe, that’s not a bet we would take right now.

 

 

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.