Belmont Home Values–Are They Sustainable in 2014?

Belmont Home Values for 2013–A Market Re-Cap

This year-end summary is where we bring you the re-cap for Belmont Home Sales. To say the least, Belmont sellers had a good year. After watching their home values drop for five years in a row (until 2011), they finally enjoyed some relief in 2012 and in 2013 as Belmont home prices reached a new high never seen before.

Here’s how it all stacked up.

This graph shows the median price in Belmont from 2012 through 2013. Many postulate about whether the market has returned to its previous high. To answer that, we looked at the median home trend in Belmont going back to 1998. Belmont’s median home price was over the million dollar mark for every month last year—save March. The closest we came to that was back in 2007 when we hit a period over the million dollar mark only twice. In many areas of the east bay and the country as a whole, they are still shy of the highs seen in 2006.

Belmont Median Price Trend 1012-2013

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

The median home price in Belmont last year, as reported by the Multiple Listing Service [MLS] in aggregate form, was up 19.5% from $949,230 in 2012 to $1,133,917 in 2013.  But not all areas fared the same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This map show which areas of Belmont increased more year-over-year than others. If this seems odd to you, read the post we did on Which City is More Affordable—Belmont or San Carlos where we discuss some of the idiosyncrasies that have an effect on micro-regional values.

Belmont 2013 areas median Adjusted

 

If you’re like us and you are wondering why some areas of Belmont saw so much more appreciation than others, we took another step and looked into the size of homes selling in the respective areas during the two periods to see if that could account for the variance.

The red percent displayed on the map is the raw median price reported by the MLS and the blue percent is an adjusted percentage taking into consideration that either smaller or larger homes sold in the two periods.

These are our findings:

 

Areas

2012

2013

Variance

Raw Increase

Adjusted
Hallmark

2150

2280

6%

30%

24%
Skymont

2020

1830

-9%

20%

29%
Belmont CC

1840

1870

2%

15%

13%
Carlmont

1800

2029

13%

40%

27%
Sterling Downs

1190

1220

3%

27%

24%

 

This of course would indicate a raw median home price in Belmont of 26% and an adjusted one of 23.5%–much closer to the numbers reported in aggregate form from the MLS.

INVENTORY

The big brouhaha last year was over the lack of inventory. There were only seven fewer homes listed for sale in 2013 but 23 more sales than in 2012. Of course, this created fewer homes for buyers to choose from, which then led to bidding competition and prices going up at exponential rates.

DOM (Days on the Market)

The time it took to sell a home in Belmont last year almost dropped in half from 2012—from 37 to only 21 days.

PERCENT RECEIVED OF ASKING

The “Sizzle Factor”, or “How Hot Is the Market?” reached a new high with the average Belmont home seller receiving 108% of their asking price compared to 102% in 2012.

What can we expect in 2013? Probably more of the same. The median home price rate of appreciation should slow, as many homes which were under market value have regained much of their lost appreciation. We’d take a guess that appreciation will be closer to 14%-16% on average for Belmont—down about 5% from what we will imagine was the height of appreciation increases in 2013—we’ll see.

The factors to watch which could alter this trend will be the waning bond purchases by the FED which will serve to raise interest rates and may take away the ability for buyers to bid so much over the asking price in the latter part of 2014.

This begs the initial question of are these homes values sustainable and the answer is that depends. If the economy continues to improve and the rate of appreciation slows, than the short answer is yes—for now. But recent developments in China’s economy could have an impact on the rate of future appreciation and the U.S. economic rebound. Remember, what started the whole Bay Area recovery was jobs. If that changes, the game we know today could be over very soon.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or emailed at info@morganhomes.com.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

 

Which City Is More Affordable–Belmont or San Carlos

Belmont vs San Carlos Home Values

NOTE: This post is in response you a question posed on the Belmont Patch:

Q.    How does Belmont’s property prices rise compare with nearby San Carlos’ which has the Laurel Street downtown and the industrial area?

A.  To answer this question as posted on the Patch by Gladwyn d’Souza, we had to do compare home sales and price points in Belmont to San Carlos over a period of time to see if any trend appeared.

We chose 2006-2013, which effectively covers the period right before and through our local housing recession and into the recovery.

We’ve spent a week looking at the numbers and trying as best we could to put them into a comprehensive perspective without analysis paralysis setting in.

The short answer is Belmont is lagging the home price appreciation of San Carlos. But there’s a lot more to it than that. If I’m reading into the question correctly, (since we received more than one request for this analysis) essentially people want to find out if having an industrial and downtown area creates more value in the local housing market and if that influences the rate at which homes appreciate—which is a slightly different question than just trying to answer if homes near a downtown cost more—this question includes do homes go up in value at a faster rate than surrounding areas. If I am paraphrasing that incorrectly, I apologize.

Unfortunately, the Patch limits how long we our response to a post can be so we are including this link to our own blog page where we can give the answer justice as well as add the appropriate graphs and documentation. We invite you to join us here for our in-depth answer.

Let’s begin by answering the question do the homes values go up at a faster rate…

We need not involve Belmont for this part of the analysis—not yet. That actually serves to complicate the answer because first we need to know if the homes near downtown San Carlos are indeed going up at a faster rate than homes which are not near downtown. This methodology eliminates  unnecessary variables created by comparing two cities which could unjustly influence the results—issue such as weather, governance, schools, transportation, shopping, etcetera—to name a few.

Our Multiple Listing Service allows us to break down sales by rather arbitrary but effective boundaries. For example we can look at the White Oaks area in San Carlos and compare it to the homes just north of Holly on the Belmont border, or homes which are more sequestered in the San Carlos hills on Crestview.

White Oaks SQFT LOT $/SQFT Median Price Rate of App Size Diff Adjusted Rate $/SQFT

2011

1600

6000

$538

$932,000

2012

1501

6300

$629

$950,000

1.9%

-6.6%

8.5%

16.9%

2013

1775

5760

$759

$1,352,000

42.3%

15.4%

26.9%

20.6%
SCL Hills Rate Size

2011

2175

8058

$498

$998,000

2012

2090

8400

$546

$1,105,000

10.7%

-3.9%

14.6%

9.7%

2013

2170

8300

$629

$1,380,000

24.9%

3.8%

28.7%

15.2%

 

As one can see the raw rate of median home price appreciation is considerably higher in the White Oaks than in the San Carlos Hills. And when we compare the price per square foot we arrive at the same conclusion—that homes near downtown in San Carlos coast more per square foot and are going up at a faster rate. However, the adjusted rate takes into consideration the variation in the size of homes selling in these two areas. We factored that in as best we could—admittedly it’s not a perfect system but, for example, in the White Oaks on 2013 we surmised that if the raw rate of appreciation was 42.3% over the prior year, but the homes were 15.4% larger, then we are not comparing apples to apples. So to be consistent we subtracted this variance from the rate of appreciation for an “adjusted rate”. Normalizing these two variables offers up a much more stable rate of appreciation and probably closer to the actual difference in these two areas—which isn’t much.

Clearly it appears that people are willing to pay more to be closer to a downtown as is evidenced in the Bel-Carlos map below illustrating the price per square foot people are willing to pay. Does that fully answer the question of are homes near downtown selling for more—or appreciating at a higher rate? Certainly not. The reason is complex and two-fold. First, homes in areas which were harder hit by the housing market collapse are enjoying a higher rate of appreciation—counterintuitive perhaps to their respective locations—because they have a greater distance to rebound—in other words, the values dropped further and faster in these areas hence they are rebounding at an inverse rate.

Case in point, the Sterling Downs area of Belmont. Known for its superior microclimate weather, this area is home to many original floor plans  which consisted of a 1,010 Sqft three bedroom 1 bath home. At that size, the price point for these homes was less than surrounding larger Belmont homes and much more affordable to the first-time homebuyer—many of the very homeowners who found themselves in financial trouble when the housing market imploded. In Sterling downs in 2011 there were only 10 sales—two of which were distressed sales. Simply put—many could not afford to sell and take a loss in 2011. In 2012 the number of sales shot up to 19 but eight were distressed sales, while in 2013 a whopping 33 sales were logged and only 1 was a distress sale. It’s easy to see with values plummeting more in Sterling Downs than others areas of Belmont it’s no wonder they are bouncing back at a higher rate. And they just happen to be closer to downtown…

Sterling Downs SQFT Lot $/SQFT Median Price Rate App Size Adjusted $/SQFT Inc.

2011

1469

5387.5

$443

$667,000

2012

1190

5330

$539

$650,000

-2.5%

-23.4%

20.9%

21.6%

2013

1190

5000

$673

$825,000

26.9%

0.0%

26.9%

24.8%
Belmont Heights SQFT Lot $/SQFT Median Price Rate App Size Adjusted $/SQFT Inc.

2011

2500

9639

$515

$1,221,000

2012

2150

9600

$539

$1,121,050

-8.2%

-16.3%

8.1%

4.7%

2013

2480

8990

$613

$1,400,000

24.9%

13.3%

11.6%

13.7%

 

The second factor skewing the results is that homes which are smaller sell for less per square foot.

Is price per square foot the most accurate statistic for analysis to reflect the true picture of an areas worth? Not really, and here’s why. Larger homes sell for less per square foot because land, not factored into the calculation, accounts for more than 50% of a home’s worth. Therefore a relatively small 1,010 square foot home in Sterling downs will sell for more per square foot than one in Belmont Heights (Hallmark Area) which average 2,010 square feet in size, yet the median price is far less in Sterling Downs.

Empirically speaking, we know that people pay a lot of money for very small homes near downtown San Carlos—finding the data to clearly illustrate the phenomenon has proven more difficult.

Now for the bigger question of how does the rate of appreciation in San Carlos compare to that of Belmont’s?

Belmont vs San Carlos Median PriceTrendWhat the numbers illustrate is that San Carlos has a higher median home price than that of its neighbor to the north, Belmont, and as long as we’ve lived here (which is now going on over 21 years) it always has.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Carlos Increse over BelWe’ve noticed in both recent market corrections (1989 and 2007), that as the market cools, so does the discrepancy between the two city’s median home price. And when there’s a bull housing market, San Carlos begins to pull away at a higher rate of appreciation. Of course as in nature, a sort of market equilibrium begins to set in when values are too far apart to lessen the disparity in home prices—akin to water filling a void.

 

 

 

 

Here we see that not only do you pay more to live in San Carlos you also get a smaller home for the money. And since the lot sizes in the two areas are relatively similar, larger lot sizes in one area which could affect values can be ignored.

Median Price SQFT %Median∆ %SQFT∆ Adjusted ∆
Belmont 2013

$1,088,000

1840
San Carlos 2013

$1,210,000

1765

10.1%

-4.2%

14.3%

The raw data show that the median home price in San Carlos in 2013 was 10.1% higher than Belmont’s, but since one also gets a home 4.2% smaller we adjusted the true estimated median home price differential to be close to 14.3%. Calculating it another way, if we take the difference in the size of homes selling and multiply it by the price per square foot of San Carlos homes we get an additional $52,000 of appreciation bringing our median home price increase in San Carlos over Belmont closer to 16% for the year.

So it appears that the same home in San Carlos will cost you about 14-16% more–no matter where in San Carlos it is located.  The next question to attempt to answer is why?

Imagine if Belmont and San Carlos had no border? After all, the city borders exist on maps but in reality the imaginary borders are crossed frequently as Belmont and San Carlos residents have unfettered access to their neighboring cities amenities (except at the end of Hallmark Drive and Crestview).

What if we removed the artificial borders and created one large new town called Bel-Carlos, for our analysis. Now it’s just one big happy city with various neighborhoods-like it really is. Because last we checked San Carlos and Belmont offered reciprocity to their neighboring cities for access to shopping, restaurants and parks—you name it. Would a person really choose to live in San Carlos and pay more just to enjoy the distinction that their city had a downtown? After all, they could live a few blocks north and get to the same restaurants and stores?

We think that the proximity to the downtown is more attractive than the mere fact that one exists. To illustrate this we see that the values near downtown in San Carlos (price per square foot) are greater than neighborhoods further away—in San Carlos and Belmont.

Bel Carlos Map

In this map we combined San Carlos and Belmont to create a borderless “Bel-Carlos” and then we used data since 2007 in each area to examine the price per square foot which homes sold for.  In almost each case San Carlos homes cost per square foot exceeded that of Belmont’s in the neighborhoods we examined.

Now in our new city, Bel-Carlos we have the same distinction. Some neighborhoods in Bel-Carlos are more expensive (per square foot) than others. Offering walking distance to Bel-Carlos’ fine dining fetches a higher price per square foot than neighborhoods further away.

Overall, the home values in San Carlos are higher and go up at a faster rate than those of her neighboring city of Belmont. Is it that San Carlos has a larger downtown with many fine restaurants, the warmer weather, shopping opportunities, community involvement or the city governance? It’s most likely all of the above. That said, there are many who choose Belmont for the beauty of the hills, proximity to major commute arteries, and the cooler mountain air.

Whichever city you choose you call home, we’re here to help.

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or email at info@morganhomes.com.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

 

Belmont Home Values Set a New Record – November 2013 Sales

We hope that your holiday is filled with great times and fun with family or friends!

This is our last market update for the year as December’s won’t roll out until mid-January. That’s where we re-cap the entire year and take our best guess as to what’s  in store for our market in 2014.

We hope you’ve enjoyed this year’s market updates. Belmont has seen some amazing appreciation this year and November was certainly not a spoiler.

Click on the image for a larger view.
Click on the image for a larger view.

SALES

The seasonal slowdown has thus far not materialized. Belmont had 40% more sales this November than in 2012—25 compared to only 14 last year. That might seem staggering but as it turns out last November of 2012 was a bit of an anomaly in that very few homes sold when historic sales trends are reviewed.

MEDIAN PRICE

The big deal once again is the median price. Since virtually the same size homes sold last November in Belmont as did this year, the median price increase this year more-or-less accurately reflects the increase in Belmont home values. Last November the median home price stood at $901,500 while this year we hit $1,089,000—a 21% increase. But most important is that this is not a blip on the radar screen. Belmont homes values set a new record as except for April, Belmont has posted million dollar plus median home prices the entire year—a first in the history of Belmont.

Have the values surpassed those at the peak of our market? Undeniably—for Belmont.

DOM (Days on Market)

The time it took to sell a home was essentially unchanged at 23 days as compare to 27 days last year.

NEW LISTINGS

Interestingly enough we had 15 new listings hit the market in November this year. The warmer than usual weather might have had something to do with it but that represents a 50% increase over last year.

MONTHS OF INVENTORY

The time it would take to sell the existing home inventory at the current monthly rate of sales hit another low at 0.5 months. To help put the low inventory into perspective, nationally, that number still stands at around five months.

Hot Pepper 25PERCENT RECEIVED—THE SIZZLE FACTOR

Still holding at over 100% of asking, November did not disappoint as Belmont sellers enjoyed on average 107% of their asking price.  Some of you may have noticed that this number does not jive with the chart above. That’s because we calculate the percent received in our chart as a percentage the seller received of their ORIGINAL asking price, not the reduced price. The Multiple Listing Service tracks it as a percent of the price when the home sold, and that methodology accounts for the difference between our number of 103% of asking and the 107% reported. Either way, it’s a big number.

PRICE REDUCTIONS

There were more price reductions than normal this November. 20% of the sellers lowered their asking price while 16% received under what they were asking for their home. Still, 68% received more. But those numbers are just a tad bit less impressive than last November which could be rationalized because sellers are getting more aggressive in their initial pricing and thus are having to lower their expectations down the road in terms of a price improvement.

As always if you have any questions about our report you are welcome to reply to this post or email us at info@morganhomes.com or call at 650-508-1441.

And if you are considering a move in 2014, please take a moment to reach out to us. Well show you why year in and year out we have the best record for selling homes in Belmont.

Have a great Holiday and Happy New Year!

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years’ experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

 

Belmont Home Sales – Are We Headed for a Cool Down or Not?

Like a marathon finish before the New Year, Belmont’s home sales hung in there for at least one more month as October’s home sale statistics showed little signs of distress.

It’s actually amazing for us to see just how strong the market is going into what is typically a seasonal slowdown period.

In order to make any sense of Belmont’s housing statistics, we look at year-over-year numbers rather than month-to-month changes which are often influenced by seasonal factors.

Belmont Home Sale Activity-October 2013

SALES

The sales for October were virtually unchanged from last year when 23 homes sold in 2012 and 24 in 2013.

How’s the Inventory?

That’s all the buzz with agents complaining daily about no housing inventory.

 

There are three factors to look at when thinking about the inventory level.

  • The number of new listings
  • The number of sales
  • And the overall inventory level

The number of new listings this October went from 14 in 2012 to 17, the number of sales were up this year by one, yet the overall inventory dropped from 32 to 24 this October.

In October of 2013 the number of available homes for sale was 32, while this year that number dropped to only 24. That brought down the “Months of Inventory” statistic which measure the time (in months) that it would take to sell all of the existing homes on the market at the current rate of sales. Nationwide, that number is still around five months of inventory.

Belmont dropped from 1.39 months last October to 1.04 this year.

With sales staying relatively static, and new listings increasing in 2013, why then does the months of inventory counterintuitively shrink rather than grow?

The answer lies in the number of leftover homes from the previous month which linger on the market. Last year the market was strong, but not as hot as this year, so some of the September homes for sale last year managed to spill over into October causing the overall inventory to increase.

MEDIAN PRICE

The median price this October recorded at $1,135,000 which may have been a seasonal drop from August 2013 when it stood at a record high of $1,239,000, but an increase year-over-year of 16.1% when last October the median price was only $977,500. In both periods the size homes which sold were relatively unchanged at 2,037 Sq. in 2012 to 2,060 Sq. in 2013.

PERCENT RECEIVED—THE SIZZLE FACTOR Hot Pepper 25

So how hot is the market? Just last month we were seeing some signs of a cool fall market but October’s number appear to have staved off the winter housing chill for at least one more month. Could it be the warmer than usual fall we are enjoying? Perhaps. In any case, this October 20 of the homes or 83% sold over the seller’s asking price, while one home sold at asking and only two sold for less.

Last October only 35% of the homes sold over the asking price, two sold at asking and 22% sold for less.

The percent sellers received of their asking price were 100.3 vs. 108.5 in 2013. Hotter than last year, and hotter than last month when the sellers received 106% of asking.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

Case-Shiller Bay Area Home Price Index Increases Again

Case-Shiller released their home price indices for August 2013 this week which showed continued year-over-year price increases in all 20 cities while thirteen cities posted double-digit annual gains. The data showed that the 10-City and 20-City Composites increased 12.8% year-over-year.

The annual growth rates accelerated for both Composites and 14 cities.

The Bay Area continues to show month-over-month price increases and year-over-year gains, though current indications are the rate of gains may be slowing. Prices in San Francisco increased 0.9 percent in August, down from a 2.2 percent monthly increase in July.

That stands to reason since homes values dipped below where they should have been during the recession and rebounded like a rubber band being stretched too far and released—at some point all of the pent up energy begins to dissipate.

We suspect that, all things remaining relatively similar as they are today, next spring will see strong home price increases in the spring which will should taper off to moderate by summer. After all, at some point the government will stop buying the 85 billion dollars per month of bonds which helps to keep interestRed arrow rates artificially low. We of course cannot predict when that will happen, but when it does, the homeowners which will have enjoyed unprecedentedly low interest rates will be reticent to move—and that will be a defining chapter in the next new market…

But the cycle is nothing new. Having analyzed our local market for over 20 years there’s a distinct pattern. In a strong housing cycle, home prices rise fastest each spring and begin to wane after summer with winter being the slowest period for price growth and sales.

The brouhaha about home values having peaked just because July showed a slowdown in the rate of home appreciation is premature and a misinterpretation of the statistics, in our opinion.

It’s easy when listening to ten second radio sound bites during your ride home to buy into the attention grabbing headline saying home prices are falling, when what they meant to say is the rate at which home prices are increasing has slowed—as well as they should.

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

What is a Relative Bid in Real Estate?

Relative Bid Offers–Safe or Insane?

Among other tactics used in multiple offer situations, is the use of relative bids, also referred to with somewhat of a negative connotation as “Sharp Bids”. This tactic is sometimes Frequently Unasked Questionsemployed in purchase agreements for real estate when competing buyers are vying for a property.

Here’s how a relative bid might work. A buyer wishing to avail themselves of this tactic should prepare their offer with an initial stated offer price, and a caveat that their offer shall be “X” amount higher than the highest verifiable offer up to the buyer’s desired price cap—the highest the buyer would be willing to go in a worst case scenario. That’s the correct way to prepare a relative bid—a baseline, the overbid, and a cap.

What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of relative bids?

The main disadvantage is that most real estate agents do not know how to handle relative bids and/or write them for their clients. In fact, one of the largest reals estate companies in the Bay Area disallows their agents from employing or even entertaining this type of bid for fear they might muck it up and end up in a lawsuit.

To us, that’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

One specious argument against relative bid offers is that your relative bid may place you at an offer price above an inferior offer, perhaps rife with contingencies. A logical and practical rebuttal to this is that sellers use inferior offers all of the time to counter lower price offers with superior terms to match higher price offers which they have no intention of accepting.

The advantage for a buyer is they are no longer bidding blindly against themselves. Say for example a home is listed for $900,000 and there are 17 competing offers, as there were for a home we recently listed in Redwood City. Buyers have no real idea how high to bid to secure the property and in many cases bid far higher than the next closest bidder—effectively bidding against themselves.

A relative bid allows them to offer a specific amount higher than the highest offer and have control over how much they over bid in a multiple offer situation—but only if it’s done properly.

Is it legal? Absolutely. In fact another large company (with whom we have previously worked) in the South Bay actually recommends to their agents that they make the option of a relative bid known to their buyers to avert a claim of a lapse in the agent’s fiduciary duty—by not explaining all potential bidding options to one’s client.

For a seller the advantage is that they may get a higher price than they would have should they choose to invoke the relative bid offer, since typically relative bid caps are the buyers “best and highest” price they would possibly entertain—their worst case scenario if you will.

As a seller and a buyer, wouldn’t you want to know that you have all the tools available to you when buying or selling a home? At RE/MAX, we are not only allowed to accept and write relative bid offers, we have used them to our advantage in several strategic and crucial situations—much to the satisfaction of our prevailing clients.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

 

 

 

 

Housing Market Shows Signs of A Cool Fall

Have you heard rumblings that our local housing market which has been racing away like a runaway train is beginning to run out of steam, or are you in the camp that there’s still no light at the end of the appreciation tunnel?

Clearly some Belmont sellers are being lulled into believing that our housing market is just as strong as during the spring. We personally encountered two sellers last week who defied all logic and refused to sell their homes unless they received considerably over their asking price. Neither seller has since sold their home.

If a seller markets their home and receives ten offers, it’s pretty safe to say that at least the day they sold their home, they got as much as they probably could. Of course there are variables such as how well their agent handles the negotiations, but absent the variables, the highest price pretty much sets the high water mark for the home’s value on that day.

Assuming that the high bidder is the winner (they aren’t always), if an identical home were to pop on the market a week later should that seller receive more or less than his lucky neighbor down the street? Since the highest bidder now owns a home, the second seller is left with the next highest offer buyers. The question becomes will one of those buyers be kicking themselves enough to pay even more than the last home they just lost?

It appears some Belmont sellers believe that the market owes them as much or more than the last sale. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. The buyer’s determine the value not, the sellers or their agents.

The fall has brought with it a chill in the air which has cooled the superheated housing market seen earlier this year. Most of our evidence is empirical, but ironically the numbers don’t necessarily bear that out. So why do we feel the market has cooled? We are part of a Mastermind group of top producing REALTORS who gather monthly to discuss market trends and best practices. At our most recent meeting on October 17th there was a consensus from our think tank colleagues who are scattered all up and down the Peninsula that indeed the number of bidders is waning. Being in the trenches gives us a unique perspective about  multiple offer situations. Of course this begs the question, is it a seasonal adjustment or is the wind of appreciation beginning to change?

Belmont Home Sales October 2013

SALES

Home sales in Belmont for the month of September 2013 were brisk with 18 sales—just one fewer than last year at this time.

NEW LISTINGS

Last year there were 25 new listing in September as opposed to the 36 new listings which harkens back to the traditionally higher spring listing levels.

INVENTORY

Overall, inventory of homes for sale were still lower than in 2012 with only 33 homes on the market, but with the influx of new listings in September, the Months of inventory increased to 1.83 up from .73 just a month earlier—still lower than the 1.95 a year ago.

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

The median home price increased year-over-year once again from $938,000 in 2012 to $1,210,000 in 2013—a 29% increase, with the size homes selling during the two periods also increasing 22% and inflating the delta.

Days on Market [DOM]

The average time it took to sell the homes which sold in September was 13 days this year, as compared to 28 last year. This is not to be confused with the average DOM for all of the homes which are not selling—that number stands at 34.

PERCENT RECEIVED

Belmont sellers received on average 105.75% of their asking price—besting the 101.98 a year ago but far shy of the 109.5 which seller’s received just last month.

This year, 78% of the homes sold for over the seller’s asking price—up from 58% a year ago, while only 11% received under their asking price, as opposed to last year when 32 percent received less.

Has the market cooled? Certainly. Is it a seasonal adjustment or a foretelling of a market to come? Visit our blog page next week when we will look at the seasonal price and sales trends in more depth.

Disclaimer:
Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.
Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

Multiple Offers and How to Win the Housing Bidding War

Multiple Offers and How to Win the War

With increasing bidding wars in real estate, bidding on a home in the Bay Area can be a challenge at best with exceedingly frustrating closer to the norm. It’s reminiscent of the ugly Cabbage Patch Doll fights that broke out in department stores in the early 1980’s where there were more parents head hunting Cabbage Patch Dolls for Christmas than the stores could produce—one of the more shallow behavioral moments in our nation’s history.

We recently sold a home in Belmont which we listed at $900,000. We received four offers the first week. The seller chose to accept the highest non-contingent offer—not the highest offer. There was a higher offer at $1,003,000 which they did not entertain due to an inspection contingency. Last year when another agent had this home listed for sale, the sellers had two buyers rescind their deals and the sellers wanted to avoid that frustration again. They decided they were willing to accept $27,000 less for their home for the peace of mind of knowing they had a sure deal.

We think they made the right decision. Because it’s not just peace of mind they were getting, they were also getting $76,000 over their asking price—more-or-less a sure thing. Had they opted to roll the dice and the higher offer rescinded, to resurrect the $976,000 offer a second time around would be difficult. In all likelihood they would be relegated to an offer down around their initial $900,000 list price. Gambling on $27,000 when they stood to lose $76,000 just didn’t make send to them—or us either.

Last September, with multiple offers well established as the norm, we wrote an article for our blog site discussing the pitfalls of contingencies in an offer. In the last year nothing has changed except we have more empirical evidence that contingent offers often lose in a multiple offer situation, and sellers get less for their home if they have to re-market the property.

Now if your parents won’t help you with the down payment unless you promise to include a contingency, there are alternatives but they relegate you to homes where nobody else is bidding—which also means they are overpriced. Better to explain to Mom and Dad that the market has changed since they bought their last home.

So here’s the lesson about contingencies—think about it—in the above scenario, the high bidder had to make their offer $27,000 more and as it turns out it cost them the home as the seller didn’t take their offer. So how much does a contingency in an offer cost? Would the seller have accepted a contingent offer $50,000 or more above the next highest offer?

NOTE: We’re aware that many agents admonish their clients to not forgo contingencies and the genesis of their fear is to insulate them from any possible repercussions after the sale. The California Association of REALTORS recently held a seminar with the top CAR attorneys discussing exactly how to write non-contingent offers since the standard of practice in our area has evolved to embraced such practices.

Disclaimer:
Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Are Belmont Home Values Near The TOP–August 2013

Are home values near the top? Thus far this year the media focus has been to highlight the hot local housing market. Now it seems they are looking for any signs of it faltering to present a new angle. And in deed you may have already heard the recent reports from Case-Shiller and others indicating that the market is showings signs of cooling off.

When will it begin to cool? Has it already?

Remember—real estate is local yet media reports often are not. What you might be hearing in the news may not apply to the neighborhood where you live.

With the biggest housing crash since the great depression* still front and center in our memories, it’s no wonder that potential purchasers might be wary of how fast the market has rebounded.

We recently released an article discussing those very points—“What’s in store in Q4”. In it, we delve into why we believe if recent changes in market forces continue, the once rapid rise in home values will begin to wane.

AUGUST 2013—For now, the numbers are in for Belmont for August 2013 (Septembers will be out soon), and there’s no sign of a let up in our fervent housing activity—at least according to the numbers for August.

Belmont Home Values Aug 2013

[click on the graphic for a larger picture]

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

Most notably is the pace of the median home price in Belmont. It stands at $1,105,000 which is a 20% increase over last year during the same time. We’re the first to look at the size of homes selling in the two periods to see if perhaps larger or smaller homes sold and skewed the median home price. But what we found was that in August of this year the homes that comprised the sales mix were 16% smaller and yet cost 20% more. Also interesting to note was that the median home price in Belmont has been over the million dollar mark for the last four consecutive months—in fact had the median home price not dipped just below that threshold in April of this year, it would have been over the million dollar mark every month so far this year. Contrast that to the historical median price trend in Belmont which has never had consecutive months over the million dollar mark.

Summary—Belmont homes values have hit a new high.

SALES

August of 2013 saw a 55% increase in home sales and paradoxically a 70% decrease in new listings.

MONTHS OF INVENTORY†

That brings us to the inventory which was down 131% from August of 2012 resulting in a record low “Months of Inventory” factor of .73, down from 2.6 months in 2012.

DOM [Days on Market]

The average time it took to sell a home which closed in August was 17 days, down from 31 in 2012.

PERCENT RECEIVED OF ASKING

This August 80% of the sellers received on average $130,000 or 9% over their asking price as compared to 44% of sellers receiving $60,000 or on average 2% more than asking in 2012.

In short, the inevitable slowdown in the RATE of appreciation is news but it hasn’t appeared in the statistics yet. If you talk with a Belmont REALTOR® you’ll no doubt hear they think the market has cooled off a bit. We’ll look at September’s sales to see if that’s true, because July sales, (which resulted in August statistics), didn’t bear that out and neither did our first-hand experience.

Sellers of homes in Belmont should know that the majority of the rebound in equity has already occurred. The rate of appreciation will slow as the market forces we discuss on our blog begin to kick in. If we’re right and they do, the housing market will become much more sustainable—we have our fingers crossed.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_housing_bubble

†Months of inventory is the time as measured in months that it would take to sell all of the homes currently listed for sale, assuming no more new homes were listed.

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS with RE/MAX and a NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508-1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

What Does Q4 Have in Store for Our Local Housing Market?

Is it a bubble?Now that the media is hyping our local market once again with horror stories of multiple offers, and media proclaimed “Bidding Wars”, our attention turns to watching for signs of a change in the tempo of sales and/or over asking offers. Everyone knows the Peninsula housing market is red hot, and has been for more than a year now. The question now becomes, “When will it change?”

Some Pundits are already predicting a crash in what they perceive as an overheated housing bubble. Of course if they continue droning on about a market crash their theory eventually may come to fruition, but for now their bubble is more akin to a hot air balloon with scant facts to back it up.

The Case-Shiller report by Standard & Poor’s is a good macro-barometer of our Bay Area housing market and the nation as a whole. The Case-Shiller report, most recently released on September 24th 2013, showed an increase in the 20 largest housing markets across the country. In our area or “MSA” (Metropolitan Statistical Area), which includes the Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, the index had risen 25% from July 2012 through July 2013 [Case-Shiller reports are delayed by three months so the September reports was actually for July].

Economists, like the National Association of REALTOR’S Lawrence Yun, have warned that prices have been rising “too fast” and at these double-digit rates of appreciation are “unsustainable”. We couldn’t agree more. The current rate is unsustainable in the long run, but we believe that many factors already in play will mitigate the danger of a bubble. But let’s take a small step back. Part of the reason that home prices have increased so dramatically is that in many areas they were below reasonable market values for so long that just returning to normal would be a huge increase. Many areas saw homes values plummet below the cost of construction. Home prices have not reached the May 2006 peak where the SF MSA stood at a whopping 218—24% higher than today. At the current rate of price increase home values would reach the peak seen in May of 2006 in one year from now.

We don’t believe that will happen—not even in the crazy Bay Area real estate market. Why?

What’s already in play to slow the engine of appreciation and avoid another economic train wreck?

  • More homes are being built as companies try to meet the new housing demands—this takes pressure off of the tight inventory
  • Interest rates will begin rising making homes less affordable—this will put pressure on price increases and most certainly limit over asking offers
  • More equity sellers are being created every day—more inventory will mean less upward pressure on prices
  • Investors are taking a break—as interest rates rise and unbelievable deals once had from the recession are gone, investors look for other opportunities outside of housing. Less competition for homes will help keep a lid on housing inflation.

According to the Case-Shiller study, “Since April 2013, all 20 cities are up month to month; however, the monthly rates of price gains have declined. More cities are experiencing slow gains each month than the previous month, suggesting that the rate of increase may have peaked.

Morgan Brennan who writes for Forbes Magazine on U.S. Housing markets, summed it up best in her article back in June titled “3 Reasons The ‘Bubble-Like’ Surge in Home Prices Won’t Last“. And since we agree with her sentiments, rather than re-invent the wheel we rather encourage you to read more about her theory.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.