Should a Seller Disclose if Their House is Haunted?

Should a Seller Disclose if They Believe Their House is Haunted?Attorney's

Interestingly, this actually appeared in a case Stambovsky v Ackley which was brought before the New York Supreme Court in 1990 and later overturned by the Supreme Court Appellate division in 1991.

Facts of the case were that the seller had promoted their home to the community and in national magazines as being haunted, yet failed to make that questionable fact known to the buyer.

Upon learning of this ominous condition, the buyer asked for rescission of the contact and their deposit returned. The Supreme Court disagreed, yet was reversed by the appellate court a year later.

While the various factions tried to wrangle with the idea of whether or not a seller is liable to disclose something which cannot be proven exists, the courts found a way to do what science could not—claim the house was haunted with this finding, “Whether the source of the spectral apparitions seen by defendant seller are parapsychic or psychogenic, having reported their presence in both a national publication (Readers’ Digest) and the local press (in 1977 and 1982, respectively), defendant is estopped to deny their existence and, as a matter of law, the house is haunted.”

With wit and a bit of spiritual humor the judges explained their reasoning:

“…a very practical problem arises with respect to the discovery of a paranormal phenomenon: “Who you gonna’ call?” as a title song to the movie “Ghostbusters” asks.”

“…It portends that the prudent attorney will establish an escrow account lest the subject of the transaction come back to haunt him. In the interest of avoiding such untenable consequences, the notion that a haunting is a condition which can and should be ascertained upon reasonable inspection of the premises is a hobgoblin which should be exorcised from the body of legal precedent and laid quietly to rest.”

So if when selling your home you find yourself frightened of how much you need to disclose, this case may just spook you into disclosing more ghastly details, rather than less.

Happy Halloween!

You can read the full case here…

What is a Relative Bid in Real Estate?

Relative Bid Offers–Safe or Insane?

Among other tactics used in multiple offer situations, is the use of relative bids, also referred to with somewhat of a negative connotation as “Sharp Bids”. This tactic is sometimes Frequently Unasked Questionsemployed in purchase agreements for real estate when competing buyers are vying for a property.

Here’s how a relative bid might work. A buyer wishing to avail themselves of this tactic should prepare their offer with an initial stated offer price, and a caveat that their offer shall be “X” amount higher than the highest verifiable offer up to the buyer’s desired price cap—the highest the buyer would be willing to go in a worst case scenario. That’s the correct way to prepare a relative bid—a baseline, the overbid, and a cap.

What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of relative bids?

The main disadvantage is that most real estate agents do not know how to handle relative bids and/or write them for their clients. In fact, one of the largest reals estate companies in the Bay Area disallows their agents from employing or even entertaining this type of bid for fear they might muck it up and end up in a lawsuit.

To us, that’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

One specious argument against relative bid offers is that your relative bid may place you at an offer price above an inferior offer, perhaps rife with contingencies. A logical and practical rebuttal to this is that sellers use inferior offers all of the time to counter lower price offers with superior terms to match higher price offers which they have no intention of accepting.

The advantage for a buyer is they are no longer bidding blindly against themselves. Say for example a home is listed for $900,000 and there are 17 competing offers, as there were for a home we recently listed in Redwood City. Buyers have no real idea how high to bid to secure the property and in many cases bid far higher than the next closest bidder—effectively bidding against themselves.

A relative bid allows them to offer a specific amount higher than the highest offer and have control over how much they over bid in a multiple offer situation—but only if it’s done properly.

Is it legal? Absolutely. In fact another large company (with whom we have previously worked) in the South Bay actually recommends to their agents that they make the option of a relative bid known to their buyers to avert a claim of a lapse in the agent’s fiduciary duty—by not explaining all potential bidding options to one’s client.

For a seller the advantage is that they may get a higher price than they would have should they choose to invoke the relative bid offer, since typically relative bid caps are the buyers “best and highest” price they would possibly entertain—their worst case scenario if you will.

As a seller and a buyer, wouldn’t you want to know that you have all the tools available to you when buying or selling a home? At RE/MAX, we are not only allowed to accept and write relative bid offers, we have used them to our advantage in several strategic and crucial situations—much to the satisfaction of our prevailing clients.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

 

 

 

 

October’s Hunter’s Moon 2013

This week marks the occasion of the “Hunter’s Moon. A full moon which occurs each October after September’s Harvest Moon.

This can be found on NASA’s web site. According to folklore, October’s full moon is called the “Hunter’s Moon” or sometimes the “Blood Moon.” It gets its name from hunters who tracked and killed their prey by autumn moonlight, stockpiling food for the winter ahead. You can picture them: silent figures padding through the forest, the moon overhead, pale as a corpse, its cold light betraying the creatures of the wood.

So how many moons do we really have? Twelve to be exact:october-2013-partial-lunar-eclipse_72598_990x742

  • January – Wolf Moon 
  • February – Snow Moon 
  • March – Worm Moon 
  • April – Pink Moon 
  • May – Flower Moon 
  • June – Strawberry Moon 
  • July – Buck Moon 
  • August – Sturgeon Moon 
  • September – Harvest Moon 
  • October – Hunter’s Moon 
  • November – Beaver Moon 
  • December – Cold Moon

Ever wonder why the moon appears so large at the horizon and so small up in the sky? This phenomenon referred to the “Moon Illusion” is best explained by scientists but it has everything to do with your brain’s perception of relative size as it compares the moon to objects on the horizon. Try taking a picture of the same moon and you’ll be sorely disappointed that your camera doesn’t see things quite the way you do.

Enjoy the show this week and as the moon rises near sunset and appears to fill the sky.october-2013-partial-lunar-eclipse_72598_990x742

Housing Market Shows Signs of A Cool Fall

Have you heard rumblings that our local housing market which has been racing away like a runaway train is beginning to run out of steam, or are you in the camp that there’s still no light at the end of the appreciation tunnel?

Clearly some Belmont sellers are being lulled into believing that our housing market is just as strong as during the spring. We personally encountered two sellers last week who defied all logic and refused to sell their homes unless they received considerably over their asking price. Neither seller has since sold their home.

If a seller markets their home and receives ten offers, it’s pretty safe to say that at least the day they sold their home, they got as much as they probably could. Of course there are variables such as how well their agent handles the negotiations, but absent the variables, the highest price pretty much sets the high water mark for the home’s value on that day.

Assuming that the high bidder is the winner (they aren’t always), if an identical home were to pop on the market a week later should that seller receive more or less than his lucky neighbor down the street? Since the highest bidder now owns a home, the second seller is left with the next highest offer buyers. The question becomes will one of those buyers be kicking themselves enough to pay even more than the last home they just lost?

It appears some Belmont sellers believe that the market owes them as much or more than the last sale. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. The buyer’s determine the value not, the sellers or their agents.

The fall has brought with it a chill in the air which has cooled the superheated housing market seen earlier this year. Most of our evidence is empirical, but ironically the numbers don’t necessarily bear that out. So why do we feel the market has cooled? We are part of a Mastermind group of top producing REALTORS who gather monthly to discuss market trends and best practices. At our most recent meeting on October 17th there was a consensus from our think tank colleagues who are scattered all up and down the Peninsula that indeed the number of bidders is waning. Being in the trenches gives us a unique perspective about  multiple offer situations. Of course this begs the question, is it a seasonal adjustment or is the wind of appreciation beginning to change?

Belmont Home Sales October 2013

SALES

Home sales in Belmont for the month of September 2013 were brisk with 18 sales—just one fewer than last year at this time.

NEW LISTINGS

Last year there were 25 new listing in September as opposed to the 36 new listings which harkens back to the traditionally higher spring listing levels.

INVENTORY

Overall, inventory of homes for sale were still lower than in 2012 with only 33 homes on the market, but with the influx of new listings in September, the Months of inventory increased to 1.83 up from .73 just a month earlier—still lower than the 1.95 a year ago.

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

The median home price increased year-over-year once again from $938,000 in 2012 to $1,210,000 in 2013—a 29% increase, with the size homes selling during the two periods also increasing 22% and inflating the delta.

Days on Market [DOM]

The average time it took to sell the homes which sold in September was 13 days this year, as compared to 28 last year. This is not to be confused with the average DOM for all of the homes which are not selling—that number stands at 34.

PERCENT RECEIVED

Belmont sellers received on average 105.75% of their asking price—besting the 101.98 a year ago but far shy of the 109.5 which seller’s received just last month.

This year, 78% of the homes sold for over the seller’s asking price—up from 58% a year ago, while only 11% received under their asking price, as opposed to last year when 32 percent received less.

Has the market cooled? Certainly. Is it a seasonal adjustment or a foretelling of a market to come? Visit our blog page next week when we will look at the seasonal price and sales trends in more depth.

Disclaimer:
Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.
Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

Multiple Offers and How to Win the Housing Bidding War

Multiple Offers and How to Win the War

With increasing bidding wars in real estate, bidding on a home in the Bay Area can be a challenge at best with exceedingly frustrating closer to the norm. It’s reminiscent of the ugly Cabbage Patch Doll fights that broke out in department stores in the early 1980’s where there were more parents head hunting Cabbage Patch Dolls for Christmas than the stores could produce—one of the more shallow behavioral moments in our nation’s history.

We recently sold a home in Belmont which we listed at $900,000. We received four offers the first week. The seller chose to accept the highest non-contingent offer—not the highest offer. There was a higher offer at $1,003,000 which they did not entertain due to an inspection contingency. Last year when another agent had this home listed for sale, the sellers had two buyers rescind their deals and the sellers wanted to avoid that frustration again. They decided they were willing to accept $27,000 less for their home for the peace of mind of knowing they had a sure deal.

We think they made the right decision. Because it’s not just peace of mind they were getting, they were also getting $76,000 over their asking price—more-or-less a sure thing. Had they opted to roll the dice and the higher offer rescinded, to resurrect the $976,000 offer a second time around would be difficult. In all likelihood they would be relegated to an offer down around their initial $900,000 list price. Gambling on $27,000 when they stood to lose $76,000 just didn’t make send to them—or us either.

Last September, with multiple offers well established as the norm, we wrote an article for our blog site discussing the pitfalls of contingencies in an offer. In the last year nothing has changed except we have more empirical evidence that contingent offers often lose in a multiple offer situation, and sellers get less for their home if they have to re-market the property.

Now if your parents won’t help you with the down payment unless you promise to include a contingency, there are alternatives but they relegate you to homes where nobody else is bidding—which also means they are overpriced. Better to explain to Mom and Dad that the market has changed since they bought their last home.

So here’s the lesson about contingencies—think about it—in the above scenario, the high bidder had to make their offer $27,000 more and as it turns out it cost them the home as the seller didn’t take their offer. So how much does a contingency in an offer cost? Would the seller have accepted a contingent offer $50,000 or more above the next highest offer?

NOTE: We’re aware that many agents admonish their clients to not forgo contingencies and the genesis of their fear is to insulate them from any possible repercussions after the sale. The California Association of REALTORS recently held a seminar with the top CAR attorneys discussing exactly how to write non-contingent offers since the standard of practice in our area has evolved to embraced such practices.

Disclaimer:
Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.
The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Are Belmont Home Values Near The TOP–August 2013

Are home values near the top? Thus far this year the media focus has been to highlight the hot local housing market. Now it seems they are looking for any signs of it faltering to present a new angle. And in deed you may have already heard the recent reports from Case-Shiller and others indicating that the market is showings signs of cooling off.

When will it begin to cool? Has it already?

Remember—real estate is local yet media reports often are not. What you might be hearing in the news may not apply to the neighborhood where you live.

With the biggest housing crash since the great depression* still front and center in our memories, it’s no wonder that potential purchasers might be wary of how fast the market has rebounded.

We recently released an article discussing those very points—“What’s in store in Q4”. In it, we delve into why we believe if recent changes in market forces continue, the once rapid rise in home values will begin to wane.

AUGUST 2013—For now, the numbers are in for Belmont for August 2013 (Septembers will be out soon), and there’s no sign of a let up in our fervent housing activity—at least according to the numbers for August.

Belmont Home Values Aug 2013

[click on the graphic for a larger picture]

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

Most notably is the pace of the median home price in Belmont. It stands at $1,105,000 which is a 20% increase over last year during the same time. We’re the first to look at the size of homes selling in the two periods to see if perhaps larger or smaller homes sold and skewed the median home price. But what we found was that in August of this year the homes that comprised the sales mix were 16% smaller and yet cost 20% more. Also interesting to note was that the median home price in Belmont has been over the million dollar mark for the last four consecutive months—in fact had the median home price not dipped just below that threshold in April of this year, it would have been over the million dollar mark every month so far this year. Contrast that to the historical median price trend in Belmont which has never had consecutive months over the million dollar mark.

Summary—Belmont homes values have hit a new high.

SALES

August of 2013 saw a 55% increase in home sales and paradoxically a 70% decrease in new listings.

MONTHS OF INVENTORY†

That brings us to the inventory which was down 131% from August of 2012 resulting in a record low “Months of Inventory” factor of .73, down from 2.6 months in 2012.

DOM [Days on Market]

The average time it took to sell a home which closed in August was 17 days, down from 31 in 2012.

PERCENT RECEIVED OF ASKING

This August 80% of the sellers received on average $130,000 or 9% over their asking price as compared to 44% of sellers receiving $60,000 or on average 2% more than asking in 2012.

In short, the inevitable slowdown in the RATE of appreciation is news but it hasn’t appeared in the statistics yet. If you talk with a Belmont REALTOR® you’ll no doubt hear they think the market has cooled off a bit. We’ll look at September’s sales to see if that’s true, because July sales, (which resulted in August statistics), didn’t bear that out and neither did our first-hand experience.

Sellers of homes in Belmont should know that the majority of the rebound in equity has already occurred. The rate of appreciation will slow as the market forces we discuss on our blog begin to kick in. If we’re right and they do, the housing market will become much more sustainable—we have our fingers crossed.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_housing_bubble

†Months of inventory is the time as measured in months that it would take to sell all of the homes currently listed for sale, assuming no more new homes were listed.

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS with RE/MAX and a NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years of experience helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508-1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

What Does Q4 Have in Store for Our Local Housing Market?

Is it a bubble?Now that the media is hyping our local market once again with horror stories of multiple offers, and media proclaimed “Bidding Wars”, our attention turns to watching for signs of a change in the tempo of sales and/or over asking offers. Everyone knows the Peninsula housing market is red hot, and has been for more than a year now. The question now becomes, “When will it change?”

Some Pundits are already predicting a crash in what they perceive as an overheated housing bubble. Of course if they continue droning on about a market crash their theory eventually may come to fruition, but for now their bubble is more akin to a hot air balloon with scant facts to back it up.

The Case-Shiller report by Standard & Poor’s is a good macro-barometer of our Bay Area housing market and the nation as a whole. The Case-Shiller report, most recently released on September 24th 2013, showed an increase in the 20 largest housing markets across the country. In our area or “MSA” (Metropolitan Statistical Area), which includes the Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, the index had risen 25% from July 2012 through July 2013 [Case-Shiller reports are delayed by three months so the September reports was actually for July].

Economists, like the National Association of REALTOR’S Lawrence Yun, have warned that prices have been rising “too fast” and at these double-digit rates of appreciation are “unsustainable”. We couldn’t agree more. The current rate is unsustainable in the long run, but we believe that many factors already in play will mitigate the danger of a bubble. But let’s take a small step back. Part of the reason that home prices have increased so dramatically is that in many areas they were below reasonable market values for so long that just returning to normal would be a huge increase. Many areas saw homes values plummet below the cost of construction. Home prices have not reached the May 2006 peak where the SF MSA stood at a whopping 218—24% higher than today. At the current rate of price increase home values would reach the peak seen in May of 2006 in one year from now.

We don’t believe that will happen—not even in the crazy Bay Area real estate market. Why?

What’s already in play to slow the engine of appreciation and avoid another economic train wreck?

  • More homes are being built as companies try to meet the new housing demands—this takes pressure off of the tight inventory
  • Interest rates will begin rising making homes less affordable—this will put pressure on price increases and most certainly limit over asking offers
  • More equity sellers are being created every day—more inventory will mean less upward pressure on prices
  • Investors are taking a break—as interest rates rise and unbelievable deals once had from the recession are gone, investors look for other opportunities outside of housing. Less competition for homes will help keep a lid on housing inflation.

According to the Case-Shiller study, “Since April 2013, all 20 cities are up month to month; however, the monthly rates of price gains have declined. More cities are experiencing slow gains each month than the previous month, suggesting that the rate of increase may have peaked.

Morgan Brennan who writes for Forbes Magazine on U.S. Housing markets, summed it up best in her article back in June titled “3 Reasons The ‘Bubble-Like’ Surge in Home Prices Won’t Last“. And since we agree with her sentiments, rather than re-invent the wheel we rather encourage you to read more about her theory.

 

Disclaimer:

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Are Silicon Valley Home Values Returning To A Normal We Once Knew?

 

Is Silicon Valley Returning To A Normal We Once Knew?

Have we reached the top of the pricing curve? Compared to last month, single family median price showed some flattening in the Home Counties. Median price was up 9% in San Benito County, 4% in both Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, up 1% in Monterey County, and dropped 9% in San Mateo County. July 2013 Median prices are still in double digits compared to July 2012. Monterey single family median price is up 50% compared to last year, San Benito is up 45%, Santa Clara up 21%, San Mateo up 15%, with Santa Cruz up 5%. The flushing through of the distressed market in the Salinas Valley may be helping Monterey County get back to healthier trends.July 2013-graph

July’s single family sales were fairly consistent to June totals. In July, Monterey County sales rose 9%, Santa Cruz 8%, Santa Clara 3%, and San Mateo sales were up just 1%.  Compared to July of 2012, Monterey, Santa Clara, and San Mateo County sales remained flat, but there was a 10% gain in San Benito County, and Santa Cruz County sales jumped a whopping 28%. Rising interest rates may be slowing the “sale train” a bit, but we still hear a lot about multiple offers.

Compared to June, July single family inventory rose slightly in all Counties except in San Mateo where it dropped 3%. Inventory was up 12% in Santa Clara County, 6% in Santa Cruz County, 3% in San Benito County, and up 1% in Monterey County. While still significantly down from July 2012 levels in all Home Counties, inventory is gradually getting back to healthier levels, and we are seeing an unseasonal bump in properties on the market for this time of year.

Compared to June, July single family inventory rose slightly in all Counties except in San Mateo where it dropped 3%. Inventory was up 12% in Santa Clara County, 6% in Santa Cruz County, 3% in San Benito County, and up 1% in Monterey County. While still significantly down from July 2012 levels in all Home Counties, inventory is gradually getting back to healthier levels, and we are seeing an unseasonal bump in properties on the market for this time of year.

 Re-printed with permission courtesy of the California Association of REALTORS.

Drew & Christine are local Belmont REALTORS and homeowners with more than 20 years experience.

Drew & Christine Morgan
REALTORS | Notary Public
(650) 508-1441

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Belmont Home Values Rise Again in June But Fall Short of Surrounding Cities

One would have to be living under a rock to be oblivious to the reports of the hot Bay Area housing market. The San Jose Mercury released the headline yesterday that in the nine Bay Area counties the median home price rose 33% year over year this June.

June of 2012 was about the time we were seeing strong signs of a housing rebound but it was still too early to declare with certainty that the rebound would last—that didn’t occur until November of 2012.

One might wonder if Belmont is under performing since home prices only rose 6% this June over last. There’s actually good news for Belmont homeowners in these statistics, here’s why:

One of the main reason that home values have skyrocketed year-over-year in the nine Bay Area counties is that many of the cities in these counties had home prices which felt to levels far below where any market correction should have predicted they would land. In other words, the hardest hit areas with the most drastic price reductions are seeing the largest percentage rebound. Since Belmont’s home values fared rather well during the downturn, our rebound is more sensible.

Don’t tell that to buyers who are trying to get their first home. They’re seeing bidding wars going on which in June of 2013 made the average home in Belmont sell for 112% of the initial asking price.

Belmont Home Values Rise
Click on the graphic for a full-size screen shot

SALES

Home sales in Belmont—contrary to the nine Bay Area County trend—picked up (albeit an insignificant amount).  June of 2012 saw one more home sale than last June with 27 homes closing escrow.

The only event that helped sales in June of 2013 was that in May we had a plethora of new listings—35. Year over year that was a strong seasonal influx of new listings.

INVENTORY

This new category we are adding to the monthly report is all about inventory—the number of homes available for purchase. We measure the inventory level and compare that to the number of monthly sales to arrive at a “Months of Inventory” statistic. The so-called months-supply is the number of months required to sell the current inventory of homes at the current rate of home sales. Our nation’s housing inventory is seeing levels in the 4-5 month range while Belmont’s inventory is less than one month’s worth—that’s a very tight housing inventory.

The housing inventory in June of 2012 stood at 39 homes for sale with 25 new listings hitting the market; contrasted to June of 2013 when there were only 19 homes to sell and 15 new listings. The good news that might save July’s statistics is the rally of new listings after the Fourth of July week that saw a listing hiatus.

MEDIAN HOME PRICE

The median home price in Belmont, as mentioned above, was a more sustainable 6% increase over last June at $1,113,500, the second highest median home price ever recorded for Belmont (October of 2007 it stood at $1,135,000).

SQUARE FOOT

We always look at the size of homes selling in the two periods to see if there is an inequity but with the difference between June of 2012 and June 2013 being a meager 55 square feet smaller in 2013, it’s statistically insignificant. Why? Because appraiser don’t even account for square foot difference of less than 100 square feet.

DOM (Days on the Market)

The time it took to sell the average home in Belmont dropped dramatically from 50 days last year to only 14 this June—a 72% decrease in the time it took to sell a home.

PRICE REDUCTIONS

Price reductions are another way to catch the pulse of the market. The more sellers who have to lower their asking price expectations in order to attract a buyer says more about buyer trepidation  than seller’s lofty and overzealous price expectations. In June of 2012 four of the 26 sellers lowered their asking price while this June only one seller suffered from that fate.

PRICE RECEIVED OF ASKING

The price a seller receives also tends to be a good indication of the strength of the market. In June of 2012 57% of the homes sold for more than the asking price with a list-sale price ratio of 103%. This June 88% of the homes sold for over the asking price for on average 112% of the initial asking price.

Interest rates are rising and how that will impact our local market is yet to be seen. Clearly it has knocked a few buyers and sellers off of the fence.  It’s anyone’s guess how our local market will react but intuitively we believe that the days of multiple offers in the double digit range may be waning.

Drew & Christine are local Belmont REALTORS® and homeowners with more than 20 years experience.

Drew & Christine Morgan
REALTORS | Notary Public
(650) 508-1441

Disclaimer:

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Drew & Christine Morgan did not necessarily participate in these sales.

Why Waiting Out the Market May be a Fool’s Game

Should you buy a home now, or wait?

Let’s face it; nobody wants to purchase a home at the peak of the market. And most buyers would love to imagine they got a good deal. But with today’s local market conditions, that’s a tall order to fill.

The internet has changed the way buyers search for homes. Gone are the days of buyers waiting for their REALTOR to call each week with the latest new listings. Today, buyers have more-or-less unfettered access to the Multiple Listing Service where agents cooperate by sharing their inventory of homes for sale.

There is a small selection of “off-market” or “Pocket Listings” which we discussed in an earlier article. How do you find these? For that, you still need a REALTOR.

The larger question is should you purchase a home today, or wait for more inventory or prices to decline?

This graph for San Mateo County illustrates that as of June 2013 we are still not back to historic high home values—though in select neighborhoods on the Peninsula we just recently surpassed previous historic highs.

 

San Mateo Home Values

Today’s buyers are snapping up homes with a frenzied sense of urgency—and they’re paying top dollar to do so. Why?  Because interest rates are still very favorable and increase a buyer’s ability to pay over the seller’s asking price—but the trend is about to change and probably for good. We predict that in Q2 of 2014 mortgage interest rates will probably be a full point higher than they are today. And that’s not pure conjecture; the Federal Reserve has not only signaled they have overtly stated that when unemployment reaches  6.5% it will begin raising the federal funds rate—and they have already begun easing up on purchasing bonds to artificially keep rates low. In this article we discussed how much more one would pay interest over the life of a  home loan when rates return to normal levels–and the numbers are staggering.

If the entire country’s housing market was rebounding at the same rate of homes on the Peninsula, one can easily see that the Fed would have already reacted and raised rates.

Buyers are locking in lower than historical trend rates and in most cases paying well over what a seller is asking for a home because money is cheap.

Should I wait for More Favorable Conditions?

Have you been lulled into thinking these historic low rates will continue? Then take a moment to read this eye opening post we did back in March. Trying to save more money for a down payment at this point may be futile as home prices are escalating at a rate that the average buyer could never keep up with in monthly savings. Once interest rates begin to rise to normal historical levels, any perceived savings—even if the market cools off—will be quickly negated in interest higher payments.

We’ve been in business for over 20 years selling home on the Peninsula and we’ve experienced several recessions so the trends and cycles are obvious to us. Timing them is more difficult, but from everything we have seen, we believe it would be better in today’s environment to jump in and get a home today, rather than bet on more favorable conditions in the near future. If you are still sitting in the sidelines, you are betting against the odds—that unprecedented low interest rates will continue, and that home prices have already hit their peak and will soon decline. Barring any unforeseen catastrophe, that’s not a bet we would take right now.

 

 

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 20 years experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. They may be reached at (650) 508.1441.

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.