Fed Interest Rate Hikes and Your Mortgage

By now you’ve probably heard that interest rates will soon be rising. The media reports simple sound bites such as, “Interest Rates Rise” which is of little help in understanding to which interest rates they are referring—credit card debt, student loan, small business loans or home loans?

Why are the Feds Raising Rates and What will it Mean?

The Federal Reserve rate making the news is set by the Federal Open Market Committee, which is part of the Federal Reserve. It is used as part of a monetary policy to attempt to help smooth the inevitable business cycles that the economy experiences. 

When we hear “The Feds are going to raise rates”, it’s important to note that specific change to the Federal Reserve overnight rate affects adjustable-rate mortgages. One must also watch Treasury Notes and Bonds for volatility in fixed rate mortgages.

The Federal Reserve keeping interest rates low helped us all through the 2007-2009 recession and again was employed during the Pandemic to help keep the economy from wild market force swings.

After the housing bubble burst in 2007, conforming loans actually had higher interest rates due to their greater propensity for default, while Jumbo loans enjoyed smaller rates of default as they were often tired to a properties with more equity.

But the Fed needs room to maneuver and raising the rate to more normal levels gives them some ammo in their arsenal in the event they need to employ their interest rate weapon again.

Since the attack on Ukraine, the feds have already signaled that they will slow any rate hikes this year for fear of stalling the economy. Once they begin raising rates it will serve to slow down the current high inflation by dampening spending.

This is a good illustration of how the Feds use this tool during recessions to stimulate or suppress the economy.

What Effect Interest Rate Hikes will have on Home Loans?

As we discussed in an earlier blog,  the Federal Reserve rate—does not necessarily mean home loans will follow suit—though some often do. 

  • The 10 year Note (typically affects 15 year fixed rate mortgages)
  • The 30 year Bond (typically affects 30 year fixed rates)
  • The Federal Funds Rate (affects Adjustable Mortgage rates)

As interest rates on Treasury notes rise, banks can raise the interest rates on new fixed rate mortgages. That means home buyers will have to pay more each month for a loan which in turn takes away purchasing power. Typically, when interest rates rise, home prices fall. When housing prices fall, the economy slows.

One of the rates most often discussed is the 10-year note. This frequently serves as a benchmark for setting long-term rates like commercial and residential mortgages. This rate is not directly set by the government. It is determined by market forces, often as simple as supply and demand.

Although today’s rates aren’t crazy by historical standards, they are higher than they have been in years, and that’s likely to have a small effect in the housing market — though we don’t see housing prices to declining significantly.

“More than a decade of chronic underbuilding and millions of millennials moving into the homebuying stage of life has created a significant imbalance between housing supply and demand,” McBride from Bank Rate said.“While rapidly rising mortgage rates may temper the demand somewhat, don’t expect home price appreciation to come to a halt. A more modest pace of appreciation is the likelier outcome.

More About Mortgages

Conventional mortgages fall into two main categories: “conforming” and “nonconforming” loans.

Conforming loans are home loans that are purchased by government entities such as Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac and must meet their guidelines such as the amount of down payment. These organizations make the access to more mortgage loans available. These tend to be smaller loans.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) raised the 2022 Conforming loan limits in California. This allows some mortgage loans that were previously labeled “Jumbo” to now be placed in the Conforming loan limit category. Conforming loans in California generally come with better mortgage rates and easier underwriting requirements.

A ”Jumbo” loan is considered a non-conforming loan, when it is in excess of the loan limits allowed for a conforming loan. 

What Are The 2022 Conforming Loan Limits in the Bay Area?

San Francisco, San Mateo & Santa Clara all have the highest limits available—$970,800 for a conforming loan.

What Does this Mean for You?

If you’re a homeowner thinking of selling, higher rates could impact the amount buyers can overbid for your home, as higher rates impact purchasing power.

If you’re a buyer, it means money will cost you more going forward so finding a home sooner rather than later could save you thousands of dollars. Every time there’s a tick up in interest rates buyers get more anxious about completing a purchase—so expect more short-term competition.

Our belief is that a modest rise in the fed rate will have a nominal effect on interest rates, but since lenders can react in any way they choose, all bets are off to definitively say how the upcoming rate hikes will impact our local housing market.

Drew & Christine Morgan are REALTORS/NOTARY PUBLIC in Belmont, CA. with more than 25 years of experience in helping sellers and buyers in their community. As Diamond recipients, Drew and Christine are ranked in the top 50 RE/MAX agents nationwide and the top 3 in Northern California.  They may be reached at (650) 508.1441 or emailed at info@morganhomes.com.

For all you need to know about Belmont, subscribe to this blog right here. You can also follow us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/Morganhomes and on Twitter @ https://twitter.com/morganhomes

The information contained in this article is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute real estate, tax, insurance or legal advice, nor does it substitute for advice specific to your situation. Always consult an appropriate professional familiar with your scenario.

Are December Home Values Real?

Are December Home Values Real? Can we trust what we hear?

Being REALTORS, we’re used to being asked “How’s the market?”, but never more than during holiday social events.

Real estate is the topic of conversation at a lot of social gatherings—we overhear conversations when we are out and about quite frequently. Usually it’s one person telling another about a crazy home sale in their neighborhood, where the final sale price was hundreds of thousands of dollars over asking, or the number of bidders hitting double digits.

That makes for great story telling, and in fact it’s an accurate one at that. Out of the 20 Belmont home sales in December 2015, 10 sold over $100,000 above the initial asking price. So if that’s become the norm, wouldn’t the better story be the home in the neighborhood that closed over a hundred thousand dollars under the asking price? And in fact that was the case in December, when a home on Adelaide sold for $123,000 under the list price of $1,688,000. We’ll save how that could happen for our next post…

December Belmont Home Sales
December Belmont Home Sales

SALES

Belmont has 20 homes sell in December, besting December of 2014 sales by over 60%.

MEDIAN PRICE

The median home price was $1,431,000 in December, a drop over November’s median home price of $1,652,000, but an increase over December of 2014 when the median home price stood at $1,198,000. Since the median home price seems to be the factor most people focus on, we’ll try and put that ~20% year-over-year increase into perspective.

One of the problems with using the median price is that it reflects if there has been a large amount of more expensive or less expensive homes sold in any given period. In these circumstances, you can often notice large differences in the median home price of a certain city from month to month.

For this reason, it is often better to view median prices over longer periods of time and monitor the trends, rather than looking at one month’s figures in isolation.

Last year the median size home in Belmont that sold in December was only 1,430 sqft, while this December it was 1922—34% larger. A 20% increase in price offset by homes being 34% larger could mean that home values in December actually dropped year-over-year. But this is small market sample, relatively speaking, and therefore subjected to these types of wild swings in data points.

To further answer the question of whether values are still on the rise, we turn to a larger market sample—San Mateo County, where instead of the average 15 sales we have in Belmont in a given month, the county as a whole has 350.

Here we find that the median home price trend went up 22% year-over-year. Since this includes many areas which are just now enjoying the rapid appreciation Belmont has seen in the past several years, areas like South San Francisco and Daly City, this number too is a bit skewed and is not necessarily representative of our mid-peninsula cities median home price growth.

When we take the median home price in Belmont for all 12 months in 2014, we arrive at a median monthly home price of $1,283,750 and using the same calculation for 2015 we arrive at a median monthly home price of $1,506,250—or a 17% increase year-over-year.  Obviously home values are still on the rise, but the exact rate is difficult to ascertain with small market samples.

Days on Market [DOM]

Homes are still selling in about 13 days on average. This is not to say that all homes are selling in 13 days, it means that of the homes which sold, they took 13 days to sell. Some homes languish on the market even in today’s red hot seller’s market and do not sell and are thus excluded from this calculation.

MONTHS of INVENTORY

The months of supply is the time it would take for all the current inventory to sell if it all sold at the current rate without new inventory coming on the market. In Belmont, it stands at .1—yes, that’s 1/10th of 1 percent a month of inventory. To put that into perspective, nationwide the housing inventory level stands at 5.7 months.

PERCENT RECEIVED

Belmont homeowners enjoyed receiving 109.4% of their initial asking price, as compared to 107.2% in December 2014.

It is interesting to note that 35% of the homes sold closed for less than the seller’s asking price. We contribute that primarily to the slower seasonal period.

Super Bowl XLIV brings you Belmont Home Sale Stats for January 2010

Before the Super Bowl XLIV gets started we thought we’d take a look at what happened in Belmont in January 2010.

We’re including two spreadsheets—one for this last January and to help put in perspective, the one from last January.

Most statistics across the country point to January of 2009 as the low point for the real estate market. But what are they saying? The lowest point for sales, median price or what?

Many pundits are saying that home values hit bottom in January of 2009 and in fact in many of the hardest hit areas like Phoenix that may well hold to be true. But for areas that initially fared better, indications are that the price erosion is continuing.

January 2010

Belmont January Blog

January 2009

Belmont Jan 2009

(Clicking on either chart will deliver a larger picture.) 

Looking at these two data samples, it’s easy to see that sales in Belmont are indeed up—way up. January of 2009 was simply dismal with only four sales and reflected that overall uncertainty of the future as buyers chose to sit on the sidelines and wait to see how much more prices will tumble.

SALES

This January’s sales reflect more buyers entering the market and buying homes. In January of 2009 there were 31% more listings available yet sales increased this year by 175%!

What accounted for the huge increase in homes sales? Part of it appears to be the resignation by sellers that they must take less for their homes than they had hoped for a year earlier. Note that all but five homes which sold this January not only had a price reduction but on average all received only 94% of their already reduced price.

MEDIAN PRICE

Most sellers had to lower their initial asking price by $50,000 and then accepted offers another $50,000 less than that. On a median home price of $850,000 that represents a huge disparity between what sellers (or their agents) think their home is worth, and what buyers are willing to pay.

Sales were up indeed but at deeply discounted prices. The Median home price in Belmont was $850, 000 which is about 4.7% less than January of last year. But not only can you get a home for 4.7% less than last January the home you get will be 6% larger. Another way to look at it of course is that prices have really dropped closer to 11% year-over-year.

DOM

Have the price reductions and lower asking prices helped sell homes faster? Just the opposite turns out to be true. The days it takes a seller to seller their home has almost tripled from 42 to 125.

Enjoy the game!

 Data provided from the Mulitple LIsting Service.

The information contained in this blog is educational and intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, real estate or tax advice, nor does it substitute for profesional advice.

Belmont – Market Report for December 2009

It’s official. Belmont’s median home price dropped 9.4% last year from $920,000 in 2009 to $833,827 in 2009.

Belmont Dec 2009

(click on the graph to enlarge)

There’s not much good news in the way of these numbers which would hint that the market is improving anytime soon with the exception of the “months of inventory” (*see below).

There seems to be a pervasive attitude within the real estate community to spin statistics any way possible to portray a happy healthy market but in reality real estate is experiencing some of the most volatile years in our nation’s history. And things are not stabilizing at any appreciable rate; in fact, many indicators point to just the opposite. That doesn’t mean you should no longer consider real estate a viable investment. It just means that you need to go in with eyes wide open. The recent market corrections (and even over corrections as in the case of many areas) has opened up some opportunities which may not be seen again for years.

The government is spending millions of dollars to keep interest rates low and offering tax incentives to spur homeownership. These conditions are temporary and indeed the end of special incentives may mean things get worse before they get significantly better.

Looking at the year-end numbers for Belmont, CA we see several statistics which put in perspective the tumultuous year real estate had in 2009.

The time it takes to sell a home in Belmont increased this year from 39 days in 2008 to 56 in 2009.

The amount a seller received of their asking price dropped from 98% in 2008 to 97% in 2009.

The median sale price dropped 9.4% in 2009.

*Month’s Inventory seems to be one bright spot in a rather dark spreadsheet.

The months of inventory refers to the time it would take to sell the remaining homes listed for sale at the current sales pace. Two major factors in this are how many homes are selling each month and how many new listings are coming on the market. The lower the months inventory the fewer homes there are to choose from and price stability invariably creeps back into the market.

Last December the three month moving average for Belmont stood at 5.47 months and this December that had fallen to only 3.61 months.

There were slightly fewer listings this year (10) and 18 more sales which accounted for this favorable statistic.

Read our next post on the buying opportunity window which is closing fast.

Belmont Home Sales — August 2009

August turned out to be a respectable month for Belmont sales with at 16 it was just one sale shy of last year.

Bel Aug Stats

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOM

You might notice a few oddities in the Days on Market stat. First, our MLS did away with Original Days on market vs. Days on Market as they felt it was simply too confusing. Original Days on market counted from when the home was first listed for sale and the old DOM stat simply kept tract of the most recent listing. Now, the DOM stat is for as long as the home was listed for sale—even with various brokers—with the caveat that if a home was de-listed for more than 30 days it resets to zero.

Percent of Asking

True to form homes that languish on the market received less than their faster selling counterparts. Note that of the ten homes that sold in their first 25 days of being listed did not have to lower their price with six selling on average for $23,000 over their asking and the remaining four for $22,000 under.

Of the six homes that were listed for more than 25 days ALL sold for under their ORIGINAL asking price—on average the seller received $86,000 less or 97% of asking as compared to well priced homes which received 104% of asking (Read was originally listed at $1,125,000 and Arroyo at $769,000 before being re-listed at a lower number that skews the results).

Median Price

The median price of homes selling in August was $837,500 and the median size home sold was 1655 square feet. Last month the median price was $917,000 but the home sold were larger at a median point of 1,860 square feet.

Last year in August the Median price was $947,000 but the size home was also much larger at 2,030.

If you work out the numbers the values really haven't changed much at all over last August, though for the entire year they are down closer to 12%.

The fall selling season is just getting started with another full quarter soon to review. If you are thinking of selling this year now’s the time to take action—the best time is between now and Thanksgiving.

Belmont – June 2009 stats

Belmont June 2009

It’s easy to see the numbers for June are much better for sellers than they were in May. Almost all indicators are up signaling a stronger market for sellers in June as compared to last month (click on the chart to see a full size version).

Looking at the same period over last year a similar pattern arises. Almost every indictor is in the seller’s favor.

More homes sold this June and at a faster rate. The percentage the seller received was a healthy 98% of their asking price. The month’s inventory—the time it would take to sell all of the homes currently listed at the current pace of sales—has dropped to a healthy 3.1 months—far below the national average of over 10 months.

Of course there’s one nagging indicator which isn’t easily seen, and certainly not reported by real estate groups or even the media. Although the median price is up in June 4.5% over May, the size home sold in June was a whopping 17% larger. Over the same period last year, the difference is even more staggering. So even though the median price is essentially the same as it was in June of 2008, the size home you get for you money has increased 25%.

What this all means is buyers are getting better deal this year than last.

Why then is the percent the seller received of their asking price higher than it was last year? Probably because sellers are pricing their homes more realistically; and although they are getting closer to their asking price as a percent, in real dollars they are receiving far less.

Looking at San Mateo County as a whole we see the same positive statistics. More sales, higher median price, fewer days on the market and less inventory. What is not available for the entire county is the median size home sold so we really have no idea if the median values are rising, or simply larger homes are selling. We tend to believe it’s the latter.

May-09 Jun-09 Δ from May Jun-08 Δ from '08
Median $840,000 $878,000 $38,000 $877,000 $1,000
DOM 46 25 21 43 18
Month's Inventory 4 3 1 3 0
Sales 14 21 7 20 1
Inventory 62 62 0 61 1
% Received 98% 98% 0.0% 91% 7.00%
Median Size Home 1,710 2000 290 1600 400
Price per Sq. Ft.  $502.00 $493.00 $9.00 $548.00 $55.00

BELMONT-October 2008 Home Sale Report

The housing market is in a state of flux so we spent added time this month helping you understand the numbers and our local Belmont market:

(Click on the report for a size you can read)

Belmont-October 2008 

Understanding the Belmont’s October 2008 housing market takes a lot more than listening to the numbers being bantered about without insight or analysis.

Read on, as we’ll tell you what these indicators mean and how to put them into perspective.

October 2008 Analysis First the overall picture:

We rate each indicator with an arrow depending on its effect relative to increasing home values from a homeowner's perspective. From a buyer's perspective these indicators would all be reversed. In other words, if inventory levels are growing we would rate that with a down arrow since it would put pressure on lower prices—bad for sellers but good for buyers.

Here we explain each indicator:

MEDIAN SIZE HOME SOLD:

This gets a down arrow because the median size home INCREASED in 2008 yet the median home price dropped. If this is taken into consideration the true median home price in October would be $807,639—a 27% year-over-year drop.

AVERAGE LOT SIZE:

                This gets a plus arrow since it accounts for SOME of the discrepancy in the median price from 2007-2008. That’s because while the median home sold in 2008 was larger, the lots were smaller and while the lot size does not have as great an impact on the median price as the home size itself, one must account for this to help explain some of the change in median prices. It’s interesting to note for example that in 2008 none of the high priced homes which sold were in the more sought after area after referred to as “Hallmark”, or more accurately Belmont Woods, while in 2007 four of the 15 sales were in this area—no doubt accounting for some of higher home sale prices.

MEDIAN PRICE

                This is of course the mother of all data point often reported by media organizations. Not to beat a dead horse, but without more explanation this number alone could really throw you for a loop.

Yes the median home price is down significantly for 2007 but one needs to remember that back in 2007 this number was an anomaly and we discounted it back then as such.

The problem is that the median size home that sold this October is dramatically larger than back in 2007 which flies in the face of what the numbers are telling us unless there’s been a substantial decrease in median home values—which undoubtedly there has been—just not to the degree the numbers may be hinting at.

One reason has already been mentioned—the fact that no homes in the tony Hallmark are were included in October’s 2008 sales data. These homes have larger lots—many level—sidewalks, underground utilities and a highly rated elementary school. All factors that are hard to quantify in terms of real dollars, but certainly could explain why the price per square foot in 2007 was $563–$50 more than in 2008.

SALES

                Sales were virtually unchanged—one more this year than last. However, given consumer confidence, which is at its lowest point in its 23 year history at 38.0, this is a great sign since despite consumer worries the pace of homes sales as remained steady. In fact Belmont’s inventory of homes for sale has dropped in recent weeks; though some of the lower inventory is attributable to the fact that in the last two weeks NO NEW LISTINGS have come on the market—a first as far back as we can remember!

 

From the Consumer Confidence web site:

“The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index™, which had improved moderately in September, fell to an all-time low in October. The Index now stands at 38.0 (1985=100), down from 61.4 in September. The Present Situation Index decreased to 41.9 from 61.1 last month. The Expectations Index declined to 35.5 from 61.5 in September.

“The Consumer Confidence Survey™ is based on a representative sample of 5,000 U.S. households. The monthly survey is conducted for The Conference Board by TNS. TNS is the world's largest custom research company. The cutoff date for October's preliminary results was October 21st.”

DAYS ON THE MARKET

                This stat tells us how long it takes to sell a home. At first glance it appears to have dropped by a few days this year which would be a sign that homes are selling faster. Further analysis reveals that the Total Days on Market (also referred to as the continuous days on the market) has actually increased. What can account for this? Simply put, more agents are playing the game of re-listing a home that has been sitting on the market too long. That resets the Days on Market stat which consumers see but not the CDOM stat that agents are privy too. Don’t worry, your agent must disclose the real CDOM if you are making an offer.

HOMES SOLD OVER/UNDER ASKING

                More homes sold over asking this year than last October but that isn’t important if prices are lower. This could just mean that more agents are pricing homes lower intentionally in order to bring more attention and get homes sold in multiple offers (yes multiple offers are still happening on well priced properties). What’s important to note here is that homes which sold over the asking price sold for half of the amount over in 2008 as they did in 2007; and homes that sold under the asking price sold for twice as much less in 2008 as compared to 2007. That’s definitely a sign a weaker market.

NUMBER/AVERAGE REDUCTIONS

                This number provides us with little insight this month as these two periods are virtually unchanged. It’s nevertheless a good sign that they haven’t increased significantly at all.

PERCENT RECEIVED OF ASKING

                This number can also be misleading if homes are selling for significantly less, but closer to the asking price—this number could actually be higher in a down market. All it would take is for sellers to list their homes decidedly lower than market value, get multiple offers and create an environment where the homes sell over the asking price, yet lower in real dollars.

If you’ve gotten this far good for you. These are just some of the variables we take into consideration when analyzing our local market. So what does all this mean for home values in Belmont?

We expect prices to decrease year over year into 2009. On what magnitude? Probably not much since Belmont is insulated rather nicely on the Peninsula with no room for real growth and a relatively short supply of homes. Of course the impact of the current recession (yes we believe we are in a recession) and its affect on jobs will be a determining factor for inventory levels—if homeowners are forced to sell due to job relocation or losses and the market is flooded with homes for sale, with few new home buyer prospects prices could drop precipitously—in the neighborhood of 15%. Absent those dire conditions we expect a tamer drop of 6-8% through the third quarter of 2009. The next several years may remain flat in terms of appreciation has trepidatious buyers reluctantly return to the home buying market.

Other extraneous factors such as the cost of money could have a huge bearing on prices as well. Homeowner affordability is a key factor in bringing buyers into the market and while lower prices mean more buyers can afford homes, any increase in interest rates could easily wipe out the savings of lower home prices and forestall any market rebound.

This information is for entertainment purposes only and includes no legal, accounting or real estate advice nor is this intended to be specific to your situation-always consult a specialist who is familiar with the details of your situation. Data retreived from the multiple listing service–ProLIstings, San Mateo County