Belmont Real Estate-December Sales 2007

December 2007 Belmont Market Report:

All_bel_dec_sales_2

↑Belmont ended the year with 17 sales in December as compared to 14 in 2006 and off the high of 25 in 2005.

That’s a glimpse the local market may be settling down.

↑Of those 17 sales, eight sold over the seller’s asking price, two sold at asking and seven homes sold under asking. We indicate this to be positive since it underscores the market is still healthy in certain segments.

The average time it took to sell a home was 39 days. Of the homes which sold over asking they took only 18 days to sell and on average sold for 3.61% over what the seller was asking. Seller’s which received their asking price took on average 40 days to sell their home and homes which sold under the asking price averaged 56 days on the market and sold for 5.26% less than their original asking price. Clearly, pricing a home correctly remains a crucial factor in getting the most for a home.

New_listings_in_belmont_2005_to_200↓Inventory remains higher than usual for this time of year.

One of the factors which helped keep inventory levels in check was the paltry number of new listings to choose from in the spring and summer.

Seller’s Can’t Afford to Overprice Their Home

Days on Market and Price Received Correlation

Though the nation’s mortgage industry is tumultuous at best, the peninsula market in the Bay Area is faring much better.

Last month 17 homes sold as compared to 14 in 2006 and off the high of 25 in 2005.

Of those 17 sales eight sold over the seller’s asking price, two sold at asking and seven homes sold under asking. Dom_received                                                                                    

The average time it took to sell a home was 39 days. Of the homes which sold over asking however, they took only 18 days to sell and on average sold for 3.61% over what the seller was asking. Seller’s which received their asking price took on average 40 days to sell, and homes which sold under the asking price averaged 56 days on the market and sold for 5.26% less than their original asking price.

Clearly, pricing a home correctly remains a crucial factor in getting the most for a home. These numbers illustrates a swing of almost 9% in what a seller received between a home priced to sell quickly and one which lingered on the market.

Hello 2008!

We’re busy compiling the numbers from 2007 to see where the housing market ended compared to 2006. Of course the peninsula market fared relatively well compared to many California cities and that of other states.

Why did certain areas do better? We look at understanding the issues which caused the current market conditions to predict which areas will be impacted more than others.

The jolt that knocked over the housing house of cards was interest rates and adjustable teaser rates indexing to higher levels. In the past five years many investment properties were purchased with adjustable loans. This enabled an investor to break-even on their mortgage payment vs. the rent they could charge. With properties appreciating at levels from 20-50% per year, it’s easy to see why so many investors jumped at the chance to buy in a new development. A new home often means great financing (available through the developer); purchase incentives, literally no maintenance issues; in fact many speculators purchased unfinished homes and re-sold them six months later at completion for a tidy profit.

The first shoe to drop:

When interest rates began rising many speculative investments became less lucrative. As investors began selling off properties in droves, inventory grew and home values dropped.

The second shoe to drop:
Owner occupied homeowners also found themselves in difficult situations. Many had qualified for their loans based on a teaser start rate. Once the rates fully adjusted, they could no longer afford their home (the practice of qualifying people for a loan at the teaser start rates has been discontinued by every lending institution we know). Faced with lower values, many could not sell their home for what they owed. The result was an increase in foreclosures and short sales.

Both of these groups faced similar dilemma, as they could either no longer afford to own their home, or it no longer made financial sense. Forced with foreclosure, the need to sell, or the desire to liquidate, the market was flooded with the mortgage carnage crisis as evidenced by the staggering inventory levels.

Areas that were hit hard and will continue to see a downturn in values in 2008 have the following in common:

·         Rampant growth spawned by increased demand

·         Speculative ownership

·         Over development of new housing projects

·         Room for expansion into new developments and housing units

·         An abundance of sub-prime loans

This is precisely why the Peninsula should fare better than other areas.

·         There is little room for expansion

·         Few new development has occurred in the past five years as compared to areas with growth potential

·         High paying jobs are plentiful

·         Low rate of speculative ownership

·         Few sub-prime loans

Of course not to be overlooked or under appreciated is the desire to live in the technologically and culturally rich Bay Area.

However, it’s entirely possible we are on a precipice which could collapse at any time. What is impacting the Peninsula is the rising cost of energy–especially gasoline. What could have an incalculable impact would be a prolonged recession and loss of local jobs; either of these would undoubtedly bring a decrease in home values to the Peninsula. So much of the values in the Bay Area rely on the perception that it’s a great place to live. A natural disaster (such as a large earthquake) or terrorist attack would also have a detrimental economic effect on housing. Buyers who are sitting on the sideline and not availing themselves of the current conditions are essentially betting on any one of the former conditions manifesting in the near future.

Who’s buying a home right now? With appreciation levels essentially stalled for the time being, savvy investors will take advantage of other’s misfortunes and home buyers previously priced out of the market will seek opportunities in the less competitive market conditions.

New Year’s Day. Why January 1st?

Why do we celebrate New Year’s Day on January 1st? For the same reason the sun never came up in Brittan for 12 days back in 1784—calendars.Champagne_2

On September 2, 1752 the good people of England went to bed and when they awoke it was 12 days later. The sun never came up during those days—no newspapers were printed, no one died and no one was born. What happened to freeze time for 12 days? It was the British Calendar Act of 1751, which declared the day after Wednesday the 2nd of September to be Thursday the 14th.

The reason for the correction was that Brittan continued to use the Julian calendar well after many countries had switched to the Georgian Calendar we us today. Hence the official British calendar differed from most of continental Europe by 11 days. That meant that September 2nd in England was September 13th In France.

The Julian Calendar, named after Julius Caesar who requested its creation in 45 B.C.E, consisted of 11 months of 30 or 31 days, and a 28 day February—to include an intercalary day every fourth year. This calendar only varied from a solar year by about 11.5 minutes each year. By the sixteenth century though this variation had the effect of putting the Julian calendar behind the true solar calendar by 10 days. Pope Gregory VIII advanced the calendar 10 days in 1582 and adopted the Georgian Calendar. Several other key changes were made including the first of the year would begin on January 1st, not March 25th.

But protestant countries such as England were reluctant to make these changes resulting in a difference between British colony calendars and that of some European countries of 11 days by 1752.

There were other hold-outs. Germany and the Netherlands did not agree to adopt the Gregorian calendar until 1698. Russia waited until after the revolution of 1918, and Greece did not weigh in until 1923.

Grand Jury Gives Carlmont High School a Lesson in Enrollment

The Civil Grand Jury directed Carlmont High Scholl to clarify its own open-enrollment program and limit the number of students who can transfer, increase capacity, or change school boundaries. School_stairs

Carlmont is over its official capacity of 2,100 students. Administrators say the district’s use of open enrollment – which allows students to choose a school outside the one designated by attendance boundaries – along with the popularity of Carlmont has caused the shift.

Superintendent Pat Gemma said for starters, the district plans to allow only about 80 open enrollment transfers to Carlmont for the freshman class that will start next fall, compared to about 220 transfers that were let in this fall.

Students with siblings at the school will get the highest priority, followed by those who chose Carlmont after making a documented effort to educate themselves on the options. ""There’s no question in my mind nor the mind of the principal at Carlmont that 2,300 students at Carlmont is too many," Gemma said.

With that in mind is seem unlikely that Carlmont will be choosing the option of increasing capacity, and will likely be forced to move school boundaries. Currently, any eligible Belmont resident can go to Carlmont High while only certain parts of San Carlos may attend providing they are within the designated school boundaries. The third option has been to apply for an intra-district transfer to Carlmont.

This dilemma could have an impact on housing values as buyers are apparently more inclined to pay extra to live within the Calrmont School boundaries. The folks who bought in San Carlos thinking they were well within the Carlmont High School boundaries may find out that everything has changed—including what someone will pay to live there.

Help Us Go Green!

Help Us Go Green!

Greenworld

Help us continue to decrease the need for environmentally demanding postal mail while enriching our schools—all while keeping abreast of Belmont’s housing market and local issues.

For a limited time, for every verified email address we receive on our Newsletter Form we’ll donate $1.00 to Belmont’s School Force.*

As Real Estate agents and homeowners in Belmont, we are directly involved with fielding questions about the local schools. The importance of quality education, beside the obvious responsibility of providing education as a social benefit, has a direct bearing on a city’s quality of life which translates indirectly into higher home values. Whether a homeowner has children benefitting from the great education Belmont’s schools provide or not, supporting the local schools is one of the least expensive and best investments a homeowner can make to increase property values.

The Belmont/Redwood Shores school district continues to excel and part of their success is attributable to Belmont’s School Force™, a non-profit organization founded in 2001 which concentrates their efforts on improving the quality of education in our schools through fundraising for programs which would otherwise be discontinued.

Our commitment to minimizing the impact we have on the environment is accomplished through available communication technologies such as our e-market updates and newsletters; our local Belmont blog, BeautifulMounatinBlog.org and our market reports web site MorganHomes.com.

We’re running a business and part of our advertising campaign is to remind people of our services. We currently mail our Belmont Market Report, and the Morgan Report real estate update, to thousands of Belmont residents. With the prevalent adoption of high speed Internet access and quality HTML e-mail delivery options, our goal is to replace our postal mailing with e-mail and significantly reduce paper consumption and our costs so we may continue to offer aggressively discounted fees to our clients—it’s a win-win situation for everyone including Belmont’s schools!

* Certain reasonable restrictions apply such as being limited to one email address per household, the email must be a verifiable, working email address and the request must come from a current Belmont resident so we can remove them from our mailing list—that’s it!

Sign-up now!

Alternative Real Estate Models



Drew & Christine Morgan,MorganHomes.com


Drew and Christine
Morgan		 650.508.1441
"Helping People
Make Good Decisions"sm		 MorganHomes.com
November’s Market Reports-Our custom
graphs

 

Find
Your Perfect Home
Search
for an Open House
Get
E-mail Home Alerts
What’s
Your Home Worth?
Moving
Soon?
How’s
Belmont’s Weather?
Want
to Compare Schools?
Belmont’s
Blog
Real
Estate Blog
About
Us

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Our
Rebates		 Our
Fees

Buyers:

Buying a home should be fun and exciting
yet the uncertainty of the process and the magnitude of the
investment can be daunting.

That’s where we help. Few if any agents
are as diligent in helping you understand the entire home
buying process. Finding a home you like is the easy part–getting
the home you want can be a challenge. From getting a loan,
to negotiations, inspections and escrow follow-through our
detailed team will assist you in understanding and even enjoying
the entire process.

Sellers:

Our reputation speaks for itself. In
16 years as a partnership we’ve sold nearly every home we’ve
listed for sale.*

In today’s market it’s all about getting
your house seen in both traditional print advertising and
on the Internet with virtual and video home tours. Our "Excite"
marketing plan creates a lasting first impression with high
impact roll out of your home’s advertising.

 

 

  • We’ve successfully negotiated hundreds
    of contracts

  • We’re never in a hurry unless you
    are

  • We explain the entire buying process
    and guide you through every aspect of your transaction

  • We tell you if we don’t like a
    home and if we’d buy it ourselves–we never want to resell
    a home we don’t like and we always want our clients to
    be happy

  • We know home values in our area
    and we can assist you in making a good decision

  • We offer a listing Guarantee

  • We have virtually a 100% client
    satisfaction

  • We typically sell our listings
    in a shorter time and for more money to the Seller

  • We specialize in peninsula properties

  • We are highly respected in the
    industry

  • We are detailed and thorough

  • We have superior print advertising
    and web presence






December 10th–Property Tax Deadline

Today, December 10th is the last day to pay your property taxes in California. Many people wait until the December 10th deadline to pay their property taxes though they are due November 10th, becasue there’s no penalty until after the December deadline.

Taxes

The fiscal year for California property taxes runs from July 1st through June 30th of each year, which is why your property taxes cover those specific dates. There are two payment vouchers, one for the first installment and another for installment numbers two. Installment number one is collected in arrears in November as it covers the time period from July 1st through the end of the year. This payment is due November 10th and delinquent December 10th of each year.

The second installment is due on February 10th but the tax collector gives you and additional 30 days to make this payment as it is not delinquent until April 10th.

For those trying to get all the airline miles possible, there’s an easy on-line payment option but be aware that a 2.5% surcharge will be applied for this convenience.

Lies,Damned Lies, and then there are Statistics…

The article titled "California’s October home sales slide 40%" reported by Inman News today evokes thoughts of Mark Twain’s famous saying there are "Lies, damned lies, and statistics".

Though the number of homes which sold is easily tracked, calculating the true median home price is a little more elusive. The size of homes which sell in a particular period can greatly influence this statistic. The median price has been used quite often as a benchmark for home values since all things being equal, roughly the same size homes sell each month. However, current lending conditions affecting first-time home buyers have skewed these numbers and in fact a disproportionate number of larger homes are selling; and since larger homes sell for more, this has created the appearance of an increase in the median sale price in certain areas.

For example, one of the cities sited in the article as one of the 10 cities and communities with the greatest median-home-price increases in October 2007 compared to October 2006 was Redwood City at 20.6 percent. But if one examines just the single family homes which sold in those two periods, it reveals that in October 2006 the median home price was $810,000 and a year later $1,100,500-a whopping $290,000 more! Pretty exciting news for sellers until you look further at the data and realize that the median size home sold in these two periods also grew; from 1330 sq. ft. to 1760 sq. ft. Calculating the price per square foot which homes sold for in October 2007 ($600.00) and applying that to the difference in the size of homes sold (400 Sq. Ft.) for these periods reveals that $240,000 of the $290,000 increase was simply due to larger homes selling-still an increase, but hardly worthy of making the news. And of course if this scenario is played out across California as a whole, one wonders if the 9.9% median home price dip isn’t actually much steeper than reported?

*Data retrieved from the REIL MLS system for San Mateo County.