The Belmont Police Department, in cooperation with, Millbrae, Burlingame, Foster City, San Mateo Police Departments, the San Mateo County Sheriff's San Carlos Police Bureau & the California Highway Patrol will be conducting a joint Pedestrian Decoy Operation on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 in the City of Belmont. The Belmont operation will be conducted between 8:30 AM and 2:00 PM at several intersections in Belmont.
[official story continued below]
|
Police personnel in plain clothes will be used to cross the roadways in marked crosswalks, while motorcycle officers will watch for pedestrian right of way violations. Motorists failing to yield the right of way to the pedestrian will be stopped and may be issued a citation under section 21950 of the California Vehicle Code.
"Our goal is to raise drivers' awareness of their responsibility to stop for pedestrians in marked crosswalks," explained Sergeant Mike Braké of the Belmont Police Department. "This is an opportunity to educate the motoring public on pedestrian right of way and related traffic laws", continued Sgt. Braké [and increase our city coffers].
The departments will carry out enforcement of pedestrian right of way violations on a continuous basis and will continue to work together on future pedestrian decoy events in their respective cities.
Quoted from http://trafficticketbully.com/
Interesting arguments made. Yes, why not place a stop sign or a traffic light, or pedestrian blinking light at the intersection? It would be more effective than writing hundreds of tickets.
Having SuperHero Peripheral Vision At 40 mph–Spotting The Pedestrian’s Foot As It Leaves Curb and Touches Crosswalk
Friday, March 4th, 2011 at 3:25 pm
Comments (1)
Whenever I read an article about a crosswalk sting where dozens of tickets are handed out within a couple of hours, I wonder if the local police department spends any time wondering why so many drivers were ticketed. I drive an average of about two hours a day, a commute that requires me to take three different freeways and a variety of side streets. During these daily commutes I might come across, at most, a few drivers who are plainly driving without any regard for the safety of those around them. They might be speeding and zig zagging through traffic without signaling, tailgating in an aggressive manner in an attempt to intimidate the driver in front of them to go faster, or simply blowing right through stop signs without even slowing down.
But never in my many years of driving through the streets and freeways of Los Angeles have I ever come across more than a few of these types of drivers on a daily basis. As much as it sounds like a cliche, most people, especially when it comes to obeying the traffic laws, are basically decent, honest, and law abiding citizens. Fortunately, the dangerous drivers, the ones who flagrantly flout traffic laws and put the rest of us in danger, are relatively rare given the number of cars on the road here.
So given this experience, I’m always surprised when I read a story about how the local police department ticketed dozens of motorists at a crosswalk sting within just a couple of hours of the operation. If I’m only coming across, at most, a few reckless and dangerous drivers over the course of my commute to and from work every day, then how can there be so many of them in the vicinity of one particular crosswalk all at the same time?
Could it be that most of the drivers caught up in these crosswalk stings might not be as reckless and dangerous as their “failure to yield” tickets they received might indicate? Is it possible that those ticketed, driving at around 40 mph with several other cars in front, on the sides, and behind them, were unable to spot the “pedestrian” standing on either side of the crosswalk tapping his foot from curb to street in his game of “gotcha”? If the test was to spot the undercover officer standing at the curb in their peripheral vision and then manage to stop suddenly before reaching the crosswalk without getting rear-ended, then many good, conscientious drivers were going to fail that test. Hence, the disproportionate number of tickets handed out during these stings.
So in the interest of public safety, why are these local law enforcement agencies not analyzing the data, not asking themselves why so many drivers are not stopping for the “pedestrian” standing on the curb next to the crosswalk? Why do these crosswalk stings seem to result in so many tickets, a disproportionate number when compared to other types of stings? A stubborn and close-minded police department would not bother to ask such questions, preferring instead to pat themselves on the back for writing so many tickets in the name of public safety, and then moving on to the next sting, leaving the dangerous crosswalk behind. Such behavior is tantamount to a plumber arriving at job site, noting that one or more pipes have developed leaks, but then doing nothing to fix the leaks other than to write a trouble ticket and hand an invoice to the building’s owner.
Such a lack of basic analysis and reflection not only results in conscientious drivers getting ticketed unfairly, it also endangers the very pedestrians these police departments say they are protecting. If a two hour crosswalk sting determines that dozens of drivers are unwilling or unable to stop for pedestrians, why would you, as a law enforcement officer, feel comfortable leaving that crosswalk unprotected after the sting is over? Isn’t it safe to assume that the large numbers of drivers unwilling or unable to stop for the pedestrian during the sting would continue throughout the entire day? And, if so, wouldn’t leaving that crosswalk unprotected be a dereliction of your duty to protect and to serve?
This is the most baffling aspect of these stings; nothing is ever done afterwards to improve public safety after the ticket writers leave the crosswalk and head back to the station. If it is determined that large numbers of drivers are not stopping for pedestrians at these crosswalks, then doesn’t public safety require that a pedestrian traffic signal be installed there or, at the very least, a stop sign? If the safety of the pedestrian is truly paramount, as the sting operators say it is, then why, seriously, would you not demand that a traffic light or stop sign be installed at these crosswalks where large numbers of tickets are being written? Why not make it safer for the pedestrian –and the driver in danger of being rear-ended–by providing a clear, unambiguous, and attention-grabbing signal that screams “You need to stop!”? Fortunately, such a device was invented years ago; it’s called a traffic signal.There is a reason why intersections have traffic lights hanging directly in front of approaching drivers; they are much easier to see and respond to than a human being standing off to the side of the road with his hands in his pockets.
So rather than being like the plumber who reports the leak, but doesn’t fix it, police departments who run these stings should do more than simply write tickets. When they discover that a particular crosswalk puts pedestrians–and, lets not forget, drivers too– at risk, they need to push the city’s traffic department to install a traffic signal, or, at the very least, a stop sign. This will help to protect all of us–pedestrian and motorist alike– far more than any crosswalk sting can. It’s time to move beyond the ticket writing and sanctimonious posturing and install the equipment necessary to protect pedestrians and drivers. It may take some of the fun away from those police officers who enjoy playing this game of gotcha, and it will definitely destroy the crosswalk sting as a way to generate revenue for the two hour lunch crowd up in Sacramento and in city hall, but it sure would make the rest of us a lot safer.